Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(58,338 posts)
8. FGM is a nice way of saying removal of an entire sex organ, namely the clitoris.
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 05:36 PM
Apr 2017

It would be akin to the removal of the penis. Without a clitoris, women cannot orgasm, which is why these barbarians remove it: to assure a woman is "chaste and virtuous." Sometimes they also remove and/or sew together vaginal lips, leaving only a tiny hole for menstrual blood and urine to pass through, to assure the woman does not have intercourse before marriage. That of course causes horrific pain and infections.

Removal of the male foreskin does not affect a man's ability to have or enjoy sex. And it does not cause lifelong pain and dysfunction. Indeed, I know a man who had to have his foreskin removed as an adult because it had tightened so much it was causing pain upon erection.

Although I agree with you that routine circumcision is medically pretty indefensible, saying it is in the same category as FGM grossly minimizes what FGM truly is.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Poor girls. A lifetime of pain and dysfunction in the most intimate aspect of their lives. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #1
Glad US authorities are cracking down on this barbaric "religious" practice. redstateblues Apr 2017 #2
Obviously there is a difference in severity, but wouldn't circumcision fall under that category too? Crash2Parties Apr 2017 #3
A male can still have sex later in life without immense pain. christx30 Apr 2017 #4
FGM is a nice way of saying removal of an entire sex organ, namely the clitoris. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #8
Actually it would be akin to removal of the glans; most of the clitoris is below the surface. Crash2Parties Apr 2017 #14
They don't just remove the tip of the clitoris. nt SunSeeker Apr 2017 #15
So you're that knowledgeable about FGM? WinkyDink Apr 2017 #22
Not even close. Merlot Apr 2017 #9
I'm active in a group that exists to stop FGM; I'm well aware of what it is. Crash2Parties Apr 2017 #12
What is the name of your group? SunSeeker Apr 2017 #17
There is definitely a discussion that can and should be had around male circumcision WRT RedWedge Apr 2017 #10
I guess I see them both as barbaric; one is far more invasive and destructive. Crash2Parties Apr 2017 #13
No they are not. 58Sunliner Apr 2017 #16
Saying FGM is akin to the accepted, nondisabling practice of circumcision is counterproductive. SunSeeker Apr 2017 #19
One is illegal; one is not. Next argument? WinkyDink Apr 2017 #23
Seven-years-old is beyond infancy, BTW. Male circumcision is not functional destruction, nor is it WinkyDink Apr 2017 #21
If believed in hell I would say these horrific people would burn there. nycbos Apr 2017 #5
The children need to be taken away from their parents. PearliePoo2 Apr 2017 #6
FGM needs to be stopped around the world! Lonestarblue Apr 2017 #7
other religions malcolmboeing Apr 2017 #11
Google. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #24
Yes. 55% women in Niger, only 2% Muslim counterparts. uppityperson Apr 2017 #25
MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF THESE SICK FUCKERS Skittles Apr 2017 #18
I find this to be sexual sadism. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #20
It's imperative that immigrants be told before arrival that this is a felony punishable by prison... Hekate Apr 2017 #26
... orleans Apr 2017 #27
The FBI has a FGM tip line: 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5984) SunSeeker Apr 2017 #28
after hours surgeries, no record,told not answer questions. Doctors knew it was wrong. lock them up. Sunlei Apr 2017 #29
Some victims are speaking up. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2017 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»2nd doctor, wife arraigne...»Reply #8