FBI investigating Jane Sanders for alleged bank fraud: report

[Ninsianna]

220. Well, the donors who unequivocally state that their pledges were misrepresented for a start.

It seems that "satan's work" of rejecting proof when it doesn't serve the agenda is something that the right wing and the newly created wing of the supposed left is rather fond of. Double standards of course, there is evidence of something illegal here (deliberately lying to the bank) and something deeply unethical (influence peddling). Yes, like Sean Spicer says, "isn't it interesting" how certain DUers handle reports? He's usually projecting when he says this, since he's trying to pretend that there is something untoward happening when people focus on the wrong doings of the people he's trying to protect.

It's amazing how some DUers have all sorts of double standards, and are highly suspicious, all of a sudden. I've noted the this is quite true on Twitter as well, all of sudden so many things are simply propaganda, investigations don't matter, no one is screaming about the FBI and "emails" when the wife of the popular politician is not the woman they've been programmed to hate and to attack.

I wonder why such attention is being paid to capitalization and not to the actual facts here, which are far more legitimate in this instance, isn't it interesting how some are "handling the report"?