Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,550 posts)
11. Meh.
Fri Jun 16, 2017, 10:29 AM
Jun 2017

They rescinded a symbol. And like most symbols, it means different things to different people.


The order was enjoined. Now, "enjoin" may be a ravel verb, but here it means "was prohibited by court injunction." It went to SCOTUS, and SCOTUS said by default, "no, you can't do this." Can't be litigated because SCOTUS is the court of last result (not penultimate resort). Can't be put into effect without ignoring SCOTUS, so if it has an effect on the ground it's contrary to the courts.

Odd that no official order to not implement it was on the books; maybe they missed it, because I'm sure Obama wouldn't have left the impression that he still wanted its execution (or not) to be left up to lower-ranking DHS officers.

DACA had consequences. DAPA just took additional money for its defense, and after the court ruled against it, it's appeal, and after that court said "no", taking it to SCOTUS. The difference is important. My ancestors spoke p-Celtic, but it's not a sound shift I personally want to engage in.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DHS rescinds Obama-era po...»Reply #11