Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CentralMass

(16,874 posts)
31. I was a jury forman on an OUI case in MA a few years ago
Sat Jun 17, 2017, 03:17 PM
Jun 2017

The defendant was a fat cat banker that had been arrested on the highway. He had a good attorney and we guessed that some wvidence must have been ruled as inadmissible.

The assistant DA handled the prosecution and did it poorly in my opinion. The arresting and booking officers both testified and we felt like she should have asked the officers some soecfic questions that would have given us (the jury) more details.

I wont write a novel about it but will say that i think we all felt that he was guilty yet the proceedings and evidence that was allowed in thr trial did not give us the ability to easily render a guilty verdict.

W had one real right wing women who was quite adamant about it and another very sweet women who was her mothers caregiver and didn't want to "ruin the defendents life" by voting guilty. As the day wore on I tried my best to cover the details of the trial and spur discussion. After lunch we were still hung so i asked if we could ask tbe judge for a more complete explanation of what the burdon of proof for operating under the influence in MA is and then it was back to the deliberation room. As the day neared the end that one lone women was the only not guilty vote. it was clear to all of us that despite our efforts to get her to change her mind, she was never going to find him guilty despite feeling that he was. Then the we had to convince her polar opposite to go with not guilty.
So in the end we returned a verdict of not guilty.. The process really opened my eyes as to how our judicial system works.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the judge is lucky the jury remained hung DeminPennswoods Jun 2017 #1
I think it's over...he never killed anyone, so it may not be re tried. angstlessk Jun 2017 #2
Prosecutors plan on another trial NobodyHere Jun 2017 #9
Maybe there will be. former9thward Jun 2017 #20
Maybe a plea deal and a few months house arrest? n/t Odoreida Jun 2017 #36
Most likely there will be. LanternWaste Jun 2017 #38
Reminds me of the OJ and Michael Jackson verdicts. n/t Calista241 Jun 2017 #3
Not quite the same. Both OJ and Michael were found not guilty. Drunken Irishman Jun 2017 #30
Damn nt irisblue Jun 2017 #4
50 plus women accuse and Cosby admits in a deposition? yallerdawg Jun 2017 #5
In a criminal trial, all it takes is just one jury member. Archae Jun 2017 #6
It depends on how many holdouts there were rocktivity Jun 2017 #34
On AM joy TEB Jun 2017 #7
Justice will be done sooner or later ucrdem Jun 2017 #8
I served on a murder trial and after the second vote of beachbum bob Jun 2017 #10
Thank You for sharing this...Very informative...!!!!! Stuart G Jun 2017 #13
high profile murder case almost 30 years ago and beachbum bob Jun 2017 #17
It will be interesting to see how the jury was split NobodyHere Jun 2017 #11
usually that number is provide beachbum bob Jun 2017 #14
I don't know how I would have voted as a juror. David__77 Jun 2017 #12
i figured as much rtracey Jun 2017 #15
Maybe. Igel Jun 2017 #21
Remember the jury cannot look at what's not presented to them. forgotmylogin Jun 2017 #23
This is American Justive,,,,, Rich Folk Justice! Cryptoad Jun 2017 #16
Seems like Cosby is an old man now and his reputation has been trashed. Grammy23 Jun 2017 #18
thats sad. But Cosby is ruined and a social pariah so hes in a jail of his own making. samnsara Jun 2017 #19
Jell-O Pudding Pops Doug the Dem Jun 2017 #22
Possible or it could simply be an issue of a prosecutor simply not putting together cstanleytech Jun 2017 #24
It never ceases to amaze me. qwlauren35 Jun 2017 #25
It's not about sex. It's about power. athena Jun 2017 #26
Sometimes qwlauren35 Jun 2017 #28
The jury didn't know about the 50+ women who had similar experiences MrPurple Jun 2017 #27
The judge couldnt allow them to testify though atleast not without having the case entirely cstanleytech Jun 2017 #32
That makes sense, but not really sure why the women couldn't testify under oath MrPurple Jun 2017 #35
Because it could be considered as tainting the jury and it essentially would have forced cstanleytech Jun 2017 #37
He walks free...at least for now. apcalc Jun 2017 #29
I was a jury forman on an OUI case in MA a few years ago CentralMass Jun 2017 #31
Never underestimate the need in our society to blame women for being raped. Squinch Jun 2017 #33
and that is why women don't report it...they think no one will believe them... CTyankee Jun 2017 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATED: Mistrial is decl...»Reply #31