Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: AP SOURCES: KEY ROLE FOR CLINTON AT DEM CONVENTION [View all]longship
(40,416 posts)37. Actually it was the article you cited
As I said, it's silly to say anything about 2016 now. What is this? Permanent, eternal presidential campaigning? Isn't it bad enough that this time it went on for two whole fucking years?
Anyway, Hillary has signaled that she's out of government after this.
I hate this kind of thing. It IS rubbish. Nobody has any idea who the nominees will be in four years. Pretending they do is only doing just that. And from Hillary's own mouth, it will certainly not be her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't think you're smokin' $hit. I think you are right - a deal HAS been reached
TheDebbieDee
Jul 2012
#5
I think that a deal was made for Pres O to campaign for Hilary in the run up
TheDebbieDee
Jul 2012
#13
Hilary has said repeatedly that this is her last government job, being SOS.
CaliforniaPeggy
Jul 2012
#7
Too old. Every new SCOTUS judge that Obama appoints needs to be younger than 50
scheming daemons
Jul 2012
#35
The reason I cited the articel was to show that the idea of the Clintons NEEDING to deal
grantcart
Jul 2012
#40