Latest Breaking News

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)

20. As I wonder how thin your veneer of civility

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 01:32 PM

Jun 2017

As I wonder how thin your veneer of civility.

Six of one, half a dozen of the other... and each petulance designed by bias rather than critical thought.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

That is an absolute lie, Sanders says of college claims [View all] TomCADem Jun 2017 OP

Wonder if Bernie is going to throw Jane under the bus or is he going to attempt to defend her. Thinkingabout Jun 2017 #1

That is a really awful comment! If Benedict Donald said that, you'd be outraged! Chasstev365 Jun 2017 #6

"That is a really awful comment!" - who mentioned Hillary Clinton? George II Jun 2017 #7

A: It wasn't the OP. NurseJackie Jun 2017 #12

my gawd! LiberalLovinLug Jun 2017 #16

Yet the Vermont newspapers and other media outlets are discussing this fraud R B Garr Jun 2017 #19

I am making it personal? LiberalLovinLug Jun 2017 #21

Nice try, but your posts blaming everything on the primaries are R B Garr Jun 2017 #24

Almost beat Hillary? Seriously? He never came even close. The fact that he remained in the race lunamagica Jun 2017 #31

Seems poster #1 made it "personal", the responses merely in kind... LanternWaste Jun 2017 #22

Nice try, but that response was about current news -- the current R B Garr Jun 2017 #23

wondering if "Bernie is going to throw Jane under the bus" IS personal..... virtualobserver Jun 2017 #29

Your reply is not in context to the subthread. R B Garr Jun 2017 #30

you must be getting confused... virtualobserver Jun 2017 #33

Wrong. You do realize the posts are numbered, and that R B Garr Jun 2017 #37

each post is a response to a specific post..... virtualobserver Jun 2017 #39

Wrong again. Still wrong. This is ridiculous. The first post was R B Garr Jun 2017 #40

I laid it out for you, and you still can't follow it. virtualobserver Jun 2017 #41

You are obviously missing something and just can't see it, so move on. R B Garr Jun 2017 #42

my response was to reuse the term "personal"..... virtualobserver Jun 2017 #43

At least you admit here and a previous post that you"reframed" what I R B Garr Jun 2017 #44

I don't get to? virtualobserver Jun 2017 #45

You "reframed" what I wrote, admittedly. R B Garr Jun 2017 #46

which I can do.... virtualobserver Jun 2017 #47

LOL, moar tangents. It's hilarious, actually. R B Garr Jun 2017 #48

Thanks virtualobserver LiberalLovinLug Jun 2017 #49

It is hard for me to let this stuff go virtualobserver Jun 2017 #51

"It is hard for me to let this stuff go" R B Garr Jul 2017 #53

trashing bernie will always get a response from me virtualobserver Jul 2017 #54

Wrong again. You obsessed on my post even admitting R B Garr Jul 2017 #55

asking if he would throw his wife under the bus wasn't trashing him? virtualobserver Jul 2017 #56

Oh please yourself. It looked like a tongue in cheek R B Garr Jul 2017 #57

you are just making this stuff up as you go along virtualobserver Jul 2017 #58

This from someone who admitted to reframing R B Garr Jul 2017 #59

And thanks to you for making my point again! R B Garr Jun 2017 #52

You say Sanders brings in new members to the Democratic party by the bushload. Demit Jun 2017 #36

All I can do is refer you to these articles by the Hill and Business Insider LiberalLovinLug Jun 2017 #50

Yes, well, unfortunately neither of those stories supports your assertion. Demit Jul 2017 #60

Thats your opinion LiberalLovinLug Jul 2017 #61

"In your opinion" he is bringing people in. LOL, okay. Demit Jul 2017 #64

As I wonder how thin your veneer of civility LanternWaste Jun 2017 #20

Yet the reality is that the Vermont Senator himself bases his reputation R B Garr Jun 2017 #25

Right, but we're supposed to just ignore that. lunamagica Jun 2017 #32

They need to focus on Jane, not Bernie. LisaM Jun 2017 #2

This is counter productive. To what ? Justice ? nocalflea Jun 2017 #4

I am not interested in this distraction. LisaM Jun 2017 #11

That's why there's an investigation. George II Jun 2017 #3

No doubt: aintitfunny Jun 2017 #5

Jane Sanders liberal from boston Jun 2017 #8

The second link is interesting.... LisaM Jun 2017 #15

Jane Sanders liberal from boston Jun 2017 #38

Not a good place to go. Igel Jun 2017 #9

Not really. Complaints to the FBI are sent for partisan reasons all the time. hrmjustin Jun 2017 #27

I couldn't care less. I do find the salivation flow pretty disgusting. David__77 Jun 2017 #10

Rethugs trying to shut Bernie up Bayard Jun 2017 #13

And so to a few thin skinned Democrat voters LiberalLovinLug Jun 2017 #17

This is not about the primary. Only a few people here keep trying this distraction, R B Garr Jun 2017 #18

The proper thing is to let the investigation proceed and find out the facts Gothmog Jun 2017 #14

I take Sanders at his word that he wasn't involved in this. hrmjustin Jun 2017 #26

I am sure Senator Sanders is not involved in this beyond him sending encouragement to the bank. VermontKevin Jul 2017 #62

Yes it was. hrmjustin Jul 2017 #63

I'm going to enjoy this... Sen. Walter Sobchak Jun 2017 #28

Jane is getting the same treatment Clinton got for decades from the Republicans delisen Jun 2017 #34

I am not a Sanders fan, but I do not give any credence to this line of attack against him or Jane. StevieM Jun 2017 #35