Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,683 posts)
7. It's really rather unlikely if you think about it. The announcement comes from a commercial
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 09:25 PM
Jul 2012

genealogical company ancestry.com traded openly on the NASDAQ, so it's natural to wonder whether purely commercial motives, including a desire for a big media hit, affect their credibility. The company is based in Provo UT

You can get their analysis here: http://www.ancestry.com/obama

The ancestry.com website points us to an 1827 transcript of a 1640 trial record (original lost c. 1865, enslaving John Punch for life), a 1662 land grant for John Bunch I (apparent father of John Bunch II), and 1704 quit rent agreement for John Bunch II (from which we are supposed to conclude John Bunch III has not yet reached majority)

The press release asserts: "the surviving paper trail points solely to John Punch as the logical candidate" -- but the fact is that almost all the records are long gone

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The nation's first Africa...»Reply #7