Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

The Wizard

(13,549 posts)

4. What was the threat Trump isued

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Thu Aug 10, 2017, 08:39 AM

Aug 2017

to get the Judge to play along? How many more times be fore we lock up Trump for Presidential malpractice?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge orders new searches for Clinton Benghazi emails [View all] riversedge Aug 2017 OP

Here we go again. GreenPartyVoter Aug 2017 #1

The Trumper will never let go, he can't stand the fact Clinton won 3 million more vote than he did katmondoo Aug 2017 #2

Hopefully Trump's concern HuskyOffset Aug 2017 #7

He's 71 years old doesn't exercise and eats like shit. Flaleftist Aug 2017 #13

It's not even Trump. It's Judicial Watch. Jim__ Aug 2017 #16

Well com'on...what's the likelihood that the US SoS might have some emails that reference Russia... CincyDem Aug 2017 #31

to remind the terrorist Republicans (their alt-right-nazis) that 9-11 day is around the corner Sunlei Aug 2017 #3

What was the threat Trump isued The Wizard Aug 2017 #4

More time and money spent on Benghazi than on 9/11. I wonder sinkingfeeling Aug 2017 #5

A contrary reaction karynnj Aug 2017 #6

I do not think State will ignore it. More tax money down the trump sewer. riversedge Aug 2017 #19

Still the end result is there are likely NO new Clinton emails karynnj Aug 2017 #22

So, continue to try and destroy the Woman who is not President, but should be... Guilded Lilly Aug 2017 #8

It's meaningless Renew Deal Aug 2017 #9

Even if they find any more emails there will be nothing in them worth finding. AJT Aug 2017 #10

This judge is an Obama appointee. Laurian Aug 2017 #11

Why? You think he shouldn't have made a ruling based on law? Demit Aug 2017 #12

No, I'm surprised he doesn't recognize that this is Laurian Aug 2017 #14

.......And that it's being used to distract from the horrors of DJT. Laurian Aug 2017 #15

Neither of those are legal bases for a decision jberryhill Aug 2017 #33

That's a convenient straw-man indicating the possession of a rather strong bias. LanternWaste Aug 2017 #25

What? Demit Aug 2017 #34

Judicial Watch has been after Hillary and Bill since Whitewater. Never could get anything. haveahart Aug 2017 #17

Tweet: Today. Because in a dictatorship you crush your opponents. riversedge Aug 2017 #18

what kills me RussBLib Aug 2017 #20

Declare Judicial Watch a vexatious litigant and end this already jmowreader Aug 2017 #21

Should ignore Captain_New_York Aug 2017 #23

Is there anyway to shut down "Judicial Watch"? Dawson Leery Aug 2017 #24

Is that the twelfth or thirteenth time they have tried this? Not going to find anything this time Squinch Aug 2017 #26

But what about JustAnotherGen Aug 2017 #27

Fine, send the State Dept. on another snipe hunt. JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2017 #28

Why are the RWNJs excited about this? Gothmog Aug 2017 #29

The GOP has to keep it's dwindling base motivated Bladewire Aug 2017 #30

ABR: Anything But Russia briv1016 Aug 2017 #32