Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Mathematical secrets of ancient tablet unlocked after nearly a century of study [View all]defacto7
(14,162 posts)38. This makes me wonder about human intellect
and its potential throuout history. Have we had this level of potential for analytical thought from the beginning of civilization or were these just anomalies appearing now and then? If the potential was there, what inhibitor put the breaks on analytical thinking? Was it sociopolitical, natural cataclysmic, or maybe fluctuations in our brains evolution and devolution? Lots of questions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Mathematical secrets of ancient tablet unlocked after nearly a century of study [View all]
brooklynite
Aug 2017
OP
"... other experts on .. Plimpton 322 .. say the new work is speculative at best ..."
struggle4progress
Aug 2017
#3
He's right, sorta, but we've been using base 10 for a loooong time and are used to it...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2017
#14
360 degrees; 60 minutes; 60 seconds; months of 12, days of 30, hours of 24. The key number was SIX,
WinkyDink
Aug 2017
#15
I'm guessing the isosceles right triangle was a special case, with known useful approximations.
hunter
Aug 2017
#41
As an aside: One of these researchers is N J Wildberger - he has a History Of Math course online.
Jim__
Aug 2017
#17
Which raises the question of why did they multiply the 3,4,5 triplet by 15?
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2017
#28
On inspection, the wild fluctuations (of the sizes in the second and third columns)
struggle4progress
Aug 2017
#29
I suppose that's possible but it's very easy to see, from pebble pictures, that
struggle4progress
Aug 2017
#40
This is where I love being hopelessly liberal arts and mathematically challenged.
Pacifist Patriot
Aug 2017
#31