Florida judge dismisses fraud lawsuit against DNC

[ehrnst]

97. The reliance issue pretty much says it all.

And I think that we were inverse situations, but if you need someone else to be wrong, I can't stop you. Clearly.

Their claims are about as realistic as the claims of those who say that "late term abortions" are so common as to need legislation to keep women from suddenly ending a 7 month healthy wanted pregnancy - only to keep the discussion of medical procedures that are referred to in such a way as to make people angry in the public discourse. Not really relevant, or addresses real issues, but it sure gets those anti-choice people riled up, and mad as heck about all these slutty women, and that Planned Parenthood all over again!!! Angry people donate to campaigns.

Frivolous lawsuit and not terribly well thought out:

"Plaintiffs assert several fraud-type claims. But they do not allege they ever heard or acted upon the DNC’s claims of neutrality. Plaintiffs also assert a tort claim on behalf of all registered Democrats, even though the harm they allege impacted all Democratic-primary-eligible voters——and under their theory, the entire body politic——the same way. And finally, Plaintiffs claim that donors to the DNC are at an increased risk of identity theft as a result of the computer hack. But they do not allege that the DNC regularly keeps the type of information necessary to facilitate identity theft or that the hackers targeted, much less obtained, that information."

But hey - it sure gets those anti-Hillary people riled up, and mad as heck at that all powerful and dastertly, mustache twirling "establisment" DNC all over again, as this thread indicates. And that protective request, using "Seth Rich" as a reason to think their lives might be in danger... Jared and Elizabeth Beck certainly flushed any credibility they had down the toilet.

http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/57-D.E.-57-Ps-Mtn-for-Ord-of-Protection-6-13-17.pdf