Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

procon

(15,805 posts)
32. Did you think this through?
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 03:10 PM
Sep 2017

It was a Cat 5 storm, that means the winds were powerful enough lift off sections of the roadways -- did you miss those photos? -- and flooding washed out more roads, then there were mudslides and boulders that blocked more roads.

Do people on your street have heavy equipment and skills to operate those machines? Does everyone have axes and chainsaws? There's no trucks to haul off the debris, and no gas or diesel fuel to run those machines. There is no power and no communications, so how do you expect people to contact some group in the states that offers planes to assist disaster victims? While these pilots are willing to land their own planes at an airport, it takes a different type of plane that is capable of landing in the rough, even if a safe dirt strip could be cleared.

Rather than blame the victims, let's focus on the real problem, the lackluster federal response from the incompetent Trump administration, yeah?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

trump's huge jet probably sitting idle on some runway hidden from view nt msongs Sep 2017 #1
Naw all those jets are busy... Trueblue Texan Sep 2017 #11
It probably can't fly because Trump owes money on it The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #26
That is amazing, if everyone with a small plane did that, Puerto Rico would be evacuated in no time Not Ruth Sep 2017 #2
Evacuate 3.5 million people? brooklynite Sep 2017 #4
Land near the people, not in an airfield, it simplifies logistics for dropoff and pickup Not Ruth Sep 2017 #6
That's a great example...now cover the road with debris from a Hurricane. brooklynite Sep 2017 #7
And put 10,000 planes in the airspace above it. jberryhill Sep 2017 #9
Heh. That's what I was thinking. xor Sep 2017 #24
Clear 200 yards of road in front of your house with friends or wait for 10 miles to be cleared Not Ruth Sep 2017 #10
Piece of cake, I'm sure... brooklynite Sep 2017 #18
Seems irrational to believe that's the state of every potential landing area. LanternWaste Sep 2017 #19
I think the bigger issue would be managing the airspace xor Sep 2017 #25
There are still leaves on those trees AnotherDreamWeaver Sep 2017 #34
Did you think this through? procon Sep 2017 #32
Do Puerto Ricans sarisataka Sep 2017 #12
Not everyone needs to be evacuated Marthe48 Sep 2017 #16
Modern day Dunkirk, so to speak. n/t dixiegrrrrl Sep 2017 #23
People should understand that flight ops without radar is entirely doable. Girard442 Sep 2017 #3
With a small plane, you do not need an airstrip either, just clear a field or a short road Not Ruth Sep 2017 #5
Yeah, people forget that in WWII fixed-wing aircraft... Girard442 Sep 2017 #8
Do you think it can be done sarisataka Sep 2017 #13
But if there's too much air traffic it's dangerous without ATC. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #27
10,000 airplanes land at EAA in Oshkosh Borchkins Sep 2017 #14
A moment of truth. brer cat Sep 2017 #17
+1 dalton99a Sep 2017 #20
But there's an ATC tower at OSH. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #28
Thank goodness for these efforts. mountain grammy Sep 2017 #15
I can guarantee Plucketeer Sep 2017 #21
Ya see Trump, there are other possibilities for helping these people. You MUST do better. ATL Ebony Sep 2017 #22
Not really getting the defeatist attitudes here. moda253 Sep 2017 #29
Very best wishes to this real hero. He has accomplished something beyond price. Judi Lynn Sep 2017 #30
Heroes orangecrush Sep 2017 #31
without radar? thats scary... samnsara Sep 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Volunteer Pilots Swoop In...»Reply #32