Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: No law could have prevented Vegas shooting, Feinstein says [View all]KY_EnviroGuy
(14,489 posts)75. What about a law limiting the amount of ammo transported or stored?
For example, large quantities of ammo have no business being kept in a hotel. That is a huge fire and explosive hazard to the public. One could keep enough to load one gun for protection, but much more than that is not reasonable in a public area or building.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
166 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
True. And many believe it REALLY says a "militia" (Nat'l Guard) has that right, not
FailureToCommunicate
Oct 2017
#30
Kids in many schools have to walk thru metal detectors ever single day. Certainly a
FailureToCommunicate
Oct 2017
#33
Exactly. This isn't a minor inconvenience that adds five minutes to the check-in process.
EL34x4
Oct 2017
#131
Anybody willing to commit mass murder won't let a few ammo storage/transport regs get in the way
EX500rider
Oct 2017
#128
That only comes into play with the assumption that additional amnesties and buy-backs will be
Marengo
Oct 2017
#160
That depends on what type of arms would be targeted (no pun intended haha). I've been
Marengo
Oct 2017
#162
So what are you saying, that the person should have a weapon with a multiple shot magazine?
brush
Oct 2017
#49
On the last two issues: If you need insurance to operate a car, why not to own a weapon that can...
brush
Oct 2017
#73
Bingo. I don't know why the NRA is against it. They could be like AARP is for those over 50.
brush
Oct 2017
#144
It's clever to request a specific when our narrative is much lower hanging fruit.
LanternWaste
Oct 2017
#123
She gave the NRA and gun humpers just the quote they need. Maybe it's time for her to go.
brush
Oct 2017
#6
I think it will take a combination of actions, including what Australia did to address this problem
diva77
Oct 2017
#51
Even Scalia said there can be restrictions. Gun-strokers don't interpret gun laws very well.
Hoyt
Oct 2017
#98
Many people have thought Feinstein is not too smart. She triumphed over them all.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2017
#52
I think it was a realistic statement. But not stated (excerpt didn't say) is the follow-on:
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2017
#55
Read my post #55 you are replying to. It answers your exact question you just asked me in #56.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2017
#58
What part of "excerpt did not say" do you not understand? It is in the post title.
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2017
#62
There is nothing in the 2nd amendment saying anyone has the right to purchase or sell a gun. nt
fleabiscuit
Oct 2017
#151
Laws would have reduced the death toll. That's important when lives count & injuries last a LIFETIME
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2017
#40
"changing goalposts" charge is distraction. Binary thinking is the end of thinking. Further ...
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2017
#57
I guess hotel owners & their insurance should cover all injuries from snipers in their rooms?
Sunlei
Oct 2017
#13
No event insurance would cover the LV event so its cost will remain the same.
former9thward
Oct 2017
#35
the event location leaser & the hotel will have the shit sued out of them until state government
Sunlei
Oct 2017
#48
City ordinance banning guns with gun sniffer dogs/machines could have prevented this domestic terro
Sunlei
Oct 2017
#63
why not? cities use ordinances banning all kinds of things from n'hoods/cities. places ban guns.
Sunlei
Oct 2017
#72
I'd bet my ass, LV could have outlawed Paddock carrying 19 guns and converting them to
Hoyt
Oct 2017
#82
Converting to auto is already a federal crime. Didn't need Vegas to do that.
AncientGeezer
Oct 2017
#127
Not with a bump stock, Geezer. Gunners and manufacturers go out of their way to skirt the
Hoyt
Oct 2017
#134
If the AWB had been extended to semi-auto rifles capable of being converted with a $99 accessory
Hoyt
Oct 2017
#135
"if guns were not allowed on the street, it would be easy to detect some gun-humper with a...
EX500rider
Oct 2017
#145
No Way To Prevent This, Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens --- The Onion
Liberal Veteran
Oct 2017
#68
Law needed: People on psych meds can't buy guns -- especially more than 1.
Liberty Belle
Oct 2017
#90
That just continues a myth that mental illness is a factor in mass shootings.
NutmegYankee
Oct 2017
#108
See addendum in my post above. Your Jesuitical requirement of "mass" murder ideation is silly.
WinkyDink
Oct 2017
#114
Continuance and refinement of the AWB would have greatly lessened the death and injury count.
roamer65
Oct 2017
#99
Assault weapons and hi capacity magazines were legal to buy and own during the AWB
Kaleva
Oct 2017
#107
Uh, WHAT?! I can think of PLENTY! Outright gun-ownership ban. Ban on killer's TYPE of gun. Huge tax
WinkyDink
Oct 2017
#109
lol...no kidding...the guy had enough money to get a semi-auto rifle no matter what laws we had.
EX500rider
Oct 2017
#133
I think she meant no **current** law on the books would have stopped him, which is true.
Tatiana
Oct 2017
#157