Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,114 posts)
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 10:53 AM Oct 2017

FEMA has 'significant concerns' with Puerto Rico's $300m power deal [View all]

Source: The Hill

FEMA has significant concerns with Puerto Ricos $300m power deal

BY TIMOTHY CAMA - 10/27/17 09:58 AM EDT

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is sounding an alarm over Puerto Ricos $300 million contract with a small Montana company to restore power infrastructure, amid concerns over the firm's tiny staff and lack of competitive bidding.

FEMA will be responsible for paying for the work by Whitefish Energy Holdings, but the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA), the islands utility, entered into the contract.

According to FEMA, yes: "Any language in any contract between PREPA and Whitefish that states FEMA approved that contract is inaccurate."





Based on initial review and information from PREPA, FEMA has significant concerns with how PREPA procured this contract and has not confirmed whether the contract prices are reasonable, FEMA said in its statement. ... FEMA is presently engaged with PREPA and its legal counsel to obtain information about the contract and contracting process, including how the contract was procured and how PREPA determined the contract prices were reasonable.

The agency also said that the contract is between Whitefish and PREPA, and FEMA had no role in its signing.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/357486-fema-has-significant-concerns-with-puerto-ricos-300m-power



Editing: I'm moving the Reuters article from the main box to this box and putting The Hill article as the lead story. It was earlier, and it has more information.

* * * * *

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-puertorico-power/fema-cites-significant-concerns-with-puerto-rico-energy-deal-idUSKBN1CW1X1

OCTOBER 27, 2017 / 9:40 AM / UPDATED 28 MINUTES AGO

FEMA cites significant concerns with Puerto Rico energy deal

Reuters Staff 1 MIN READ

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Emergency Management Administration on Friday said it did not approve a multi-million dollar contract between Puerto Ricos power utility and a small Montana firm to repair storm damage, and has significant concerns about the deal.

In a statement, FEMA also said after its initial review it has not confirmed whether the contract prices are reasonable under the contract between Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) and Whitefish Energy Holdings.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is a scandal. madaboutharry Oct 2017 #1
The company that was hired? Stryst Oct 2017 #19
So, which Trumpster approved it? jpak Oct 2017 #2
Zinke - it's his neighbor and good friend!! lark Oct 2017 #14
That 300 million won't go to PR. It will go to a Zinke crony, and Zinke will get a cut. Eyeball_Kid Oct 2017 #3
Bingo. dalton99a Oct 2017 #5
Exactly! lark Oct 2017 #15
right off a page of Confessions of an Economic Hitman! Excellent book, eye-opener for me and wiggs Oct 2017 #22
Dovetails with the Shock Doctrine nt lostnfound Oct 2017 #24
And yet it's likely FEMA will pay for it, Igel Oct 2017 #32
P.R. is better off with Tesla Marthe48 Oct 2017 #4
I'm surprised FEMA would raise questions when they are led by a Trump appointee. Frustratedlady Oct 2017 #6
Question? What media outlet was first with the Whitefish PR contract story? Freethinker65 Oct 2017 #7
FEMA issued a statement. A lot of people on their listserv got it simultaneously. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #9
Sorry. I edited my post. Not the FEMA statement, but the shady contract? Freethinker65 Oct 2017 #11
The Flathead Beacon; Kalispell, Montana's; version of the mainstream media, reported the contract. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #12
Thanks. Yep. I just did a DU site search as well. I had forgotten about that feature on DU Freethinker65 Oct 2017 #13
+1 dalton99a Oct 2017 #16
Please repost this timeline as a seperate OP Tom Rinaldo Oct 2017 #25
I think the trade journals were the first ones to smell a rat. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #27
The earliest I saw was dated Oct. 6. Igel Oct 2017 #33
How much of that will trump get ? JI7 Oct 2017 #8
Which government official signed the contract? irisblue Oct 2017 #10
If California signs a contract, does the federal government look at it? Igel Oct 2017 #34
Honestly, I was more meaning the Attorney General of PR & that staff. irisblue Oct 2017 #36
U.S. Congressman demands Oversight Committee investigation into Whitefish contract. mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #17
FEMA Statement on PREPA's Contract with Whitefish mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #18
I read somewhere the Contract hs a "No AUDIT" clause buried within benld74 Oct 2017 #20
Imagine, if you will.... SergeStorms Oct 2017 #21
UPDATED: FEMA Statement on Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority's Contract with Whitefish mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 #23
Just more Trump style business deals...... BlueJac Oct 2017 #26
The Governor of Puerto Rico probably roomtomove Oct 2017 #28
Yep someone there was going to get a cut underpants Oct 2017 #29
Yes, and he might also have been told "You want us to turn your lights back on?"... Tom Rinaldo Oct 2017 #30
According to this the Feds had zero to due with it, all the PR utility company: EX500rider Oct 2017 #31
This is where "campaign contributions" come from -- laundered through government contracts. PSPS Oct 2017 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FEMA has 'significant con...