Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

alp227

(33,284 posts)
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 06:14 PM Aug 2012

Bradley Manning treatment in 'flagrant violation' of military code –lawyer [View all]

Source: The Guardian

The harsh conditions forced upon Bradley Manning in military detention have been laid out in detail as part of a court filing in which the US army is accused of a "flagrant violation" of his right not to be punished prior to trial.

The Article 13 motion, published Friday by Manning's civilian lawyer David Coombs on his website, claims that Manning, who is accused of leaking state secrets to WikiLeaks, was held in a 6x8 ft cell for 23 to 24 hours a day. In addition, when not sleeping, Manning was banned from lying down, or even using a wall to support him.

The motion also claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation", notably by forcing him to stand outside his cell naked during a morning inspection. This, his Coombs claims, was "retaliatory punishment" for speaking out over his treatment.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/10/bradley-manning-military-code-lawyer

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At least someone is in favor of our system of justice has finally stepped forward. jwirr Aug 2012 #1
Of course it is. DeSwiss Aug 2012 #2
That's what some of us here were saying all along MNBrewer Aug 2012 #3
could you point me to a few posts that say that? n/t Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #7
I was summarizing, and paraphrasing MNBrewer Aug 2012 #9
why exactly should i look for the information of your claims? Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #10
He was considered guilty by our President before his secret trial... So I guess they didn't want to midnight Aug 2012 #4
In a nutshell, exposing war crimes is not a crime, it is a duty: grahamhgreen Aug 2012 #5
releasing a ton of classified information that had nothing to do with war crimes however Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #8
A lot of the information he released should not have been secret JDPriestly Aug 2012 #13
It is the sum of the info, in toto, that reveals a pattern and practice of grahamhgreen Aug 2012 #18
Ok.... What is all this naked business... This last ten years of war everywhere we midnight Aug 2012 #6
Of course, it is Coombs' job to defend his client. From Coomb's website: struggle4progress Aug 2012 #11
Many of us see the harsh treatment Manning has received as truedelphi Aug 2012 #12
Truedelphi, this story cannot be true! JDPriestly Aug 2012 #15
Those particular charges were quickly withdrawn struggle4progress Aug 2012 #16
Here's the link - truedelphi Aug 2012 #17
And the naive believe the military is telling the truth. JDPriestly Aug 2012 #14
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bradley Manning treatment...