Latest Breaking News

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)

41. This is their leading candidate:

Fri Jan 6, 2012, 09:22 AM

Jan 2012

A 1%er shamelessly asserting that he'll do his damnedest to make sure wealthy people get even wealthier and the non-wealthy will have the shaft further driven up.

I don't know what's sadder: that this phony Four F tool is their leading candidate or that he's not leading by much over a rather stupid and homophobic man who's last name is Super-Glued to an internet joke.

Unbelieveable. And I thought Two-Term Bewsh was the pinnacle of American stupidity.

Is this where American politics has sunk?

Is this where we're at?

Are there still people on this board that think either of these guys has a chance at beating President Obama in an election? Really??? Please explain to me why, RIGHT NOW.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Romney�s Tax Plan Gives Millionaires A $150K Tax Cut, Raises Taxes On Low-Income Families [View all] kpete Jan 2012 OP

dumbass. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #1

He knows where his campaign contributions come from. tclambert Jan 2012 #11

excuse me, I meant to call him a rich dumbass puppet with a stick up his ass. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #12

. . . and I'm gonna guess the puppet has a label that says, "Property of Koch Industries." tclambert Jan 2012 #16

Wrong, he does not have a stick up his ass and you know it. cstanleytech Jan 2012 #18

He's not a dumbass. That would be the people in the 99% who vote for him. n/t pnwmom Jan 2012 #20

K&R and Bookmarked! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #2

I bet $10,000 that Mitt is a 1% douchebag jpak Jan 2012 #3

K&R pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #4

K & R. Thank you, kpete. n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2012 #5

I am shocked, shocked . . . tclambert Jan 2012 #6

Gotta vote for Mitt, then . . . Journeyman Jan 2012 #7

You expected it to be different? wandy Jan 2012 #8

Stupid rich kid BeyondGeography Jan 2012 #9

How Republicon is that? SpiralHawk Jan 2012 #10

Some might reason it is better to give $150,000 tax cuts to those who can actually use it. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #13

Because it's worked so well up til now. AlbertCat Jan 2012 #14

Good campaign talking point yankeeswin Jan 2012 #15

RECOMMENDED. JohnWxy Jan 2012 #17

So, Is The Plan Revenue Neutral? DallasNE Jan 2012 #19

Are you kidding? subterranean Jan 2012 #25

that's the kind of thinking that aided him in his job-killer capacity SemperEadem Jan 2012 #21

The Republican way sarcasmo Jan 2012 #22

Just like our Shadowflash Jan 2012 #23

perfect candidate for the 1% wordpix Jan 2012 #24

"Almost every millionaire would get a tax cut..." unkachuck Jan 2012 #26

Hey it did wonders for the economy and the middle class under Bush, so why not give it another go. MidwestTransplant Jan 2012 #27

Why thats just perfect.......... Historic NY Jan 2012 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author JJW Jan 2012 #29

Robbing the poor to pay off his big donors. And it would add $600 billion to the deficit. maximusveritas Jan 2012 #30

#OWS who don't want to support Obama. This is what you are thus asking for! Maraya1969 Jan 2012 #31

Agreement Mojeoux Jan 2012 #33

He's just looking out for #1, himself. Quantess Jan 2012 #32

Poor people who vote for him are suckers taught_me_patience Jan 2012 #34

Too early to use this. Hold your fire. itsrobert Jan 2012 #35

yeah, but the poor get the benefit from all the jobs his plan will create hfojvt Jan 2012 #36

If you're surprised, I'm guessing you're new to DU. ScottLand Jan 2012 #37

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #38

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #39

A government for the rich paid for by the poor people liberal N proud Jan 2012 #40

This is their leading candidate: HughBeaumont Jan 2012 #41

"Mister 1 percent, " nt 4dog Jan 2012 #42

"Taxes would fall for the country�s wealthiest and rise for some of the poorest ..." TomCADem Jan 2012 #43