Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
2. 1. Who paid does not matter. 2. Receiving info is not collusion. Quid pro quo is collusion.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:07 PM
Nov 2017

What tRump did was not simply receiving info. It was coordinating an extensive disruptive interferential campaign by a foreign adversary against a US citizen and US party in a US election.

Trump's quid pro quo may have been providing analytic data (possibly from Cambridge Analytica), receiving advance knowledge of emails, lifting or not enforcing sanctions against Russia, possible money laundering for Russians, possible participation in the Rosneft $8 billion stock sale deal plus brokering thereof by Carter Page, and possible erasure of debts owed to Russian oligarchs.

Plus part of tRump's quid pro quo may have been acquiescing to blackmail by filing to run in the first place.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former MI6 Officer Steele...»Reply #2