Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dogman

(6,073 posts)
69. They all are.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 07:03 PM
Nov 2017

That isn't the point. The point is what did money buy the DNC? Highly paid institutional politicians who cannot communicate with the masses, no matter how much money they blew?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bus is very heavy Not Ruth Nov 2017 #1
I Watched the interview.. busterbrown Nov 2017 #45
I agree, but Im not hopeful. nt joet67 Nov 2017 #94
Guess Elizabeth is not planning to run DURHAM D Nov 2017 #2
Or maybe she is... Elizabeth is still a loyal Democrat in good standing. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #5
Exactly ananda Nov 2017 #17
Clinton fundraised for Democrats. Sanders didn't. Not hard to explain dbackjon Nov 2017 #24
Donna Brazile didn't see it that way. dogman Nov 2017 #53
And we should take her word/opinion? dbackjon Nov 2017 #59
She was head of the DNC. dogman Nov 2017 #62
Again, she is trying to sell books dbackjon Nov 2017 #64
They all are. dogman Nov 2017 #69
Bernie and DNC had similar agreement, which Brazile did not report in her book excerpt emulatorloo Nov 2017 #77
So Bernie didn't scam the system? dogman Nov 2017 #85
How do you even come up with a crazy statement like that? emulatorloo Nov 2017 #87
Did you read Donna's article? dogman Nov 2017 #89
Yes I read the article. DWS was sidelined because of her spindrift ways, and the DNC got saved emulatorloo Nov 2017 #92
I agree with much of what you wrote. dogman Nov 2017 #137
Apparently there were two agreements one in 2015, and one in 2016 after she won nom emulatorloo Nov 2017 #140
Yes, Bernie signed an agreement Rincewind Nov 2017 #124
I don't blame him he did very well on his own w fundraising emulatorloo Nov 2017 #127
I don't care what Donna has to say... agingdem Nov 2017 #60
yup dbackjon Nov 2017 #65
Trump was a democrat too. dogman Nov 2017 #72
Bullshit. Hillary was a Republican when she was a teenager. she's been a Democract .... LuvLoogie Nov 2017 #104
And I was a Democrat when she was a Republican. dogman Nov 2017 #136
Trump is a con-man pandr32 Nov 2017 #128
Check your facts on that. Google is your friend. Zen Democrat Nov 2017 #81
Yes, but I agree with many here, we need to mend fences, & pronto, in advance of the 2018 mid-terms. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #44
Soccer Parents Blackjackdavey Nov 2017 #138
WAYYY too much!! (So sorry to hear about your family tragedy.) InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #139
I was no diehard, kind of preferred Bernie, but as an independent Drahthaardogs Nov 2017 #120
unless bernie's actively bitching bdtrppr6 Nov 2017 #130
Bernie is not. The article said he was rather stoic about it. Drahthaardogs Nov 2017 #131
That is still open for debate, TexasTowelie Nov 2017 #32
Fair comment, but I don't think Warren's past should be held against her. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #46
Why not? I recall that numerous Democrats tried to make an issue of Hillary being a Goldwater girl TexasTowelie Nov 2017 #80
I am disappointed that Warren would offer validation to this absurd narrative. (eom) StevieM Nov 2017 #98
Like HRC's was - who was a college student when she became a Democrat. ehrnst Nov 2017 #86
I think she is likely to run. Bernie too. I am so disappointed that she would offer validation StevieM Nov 2017 #99
why? DonCoquixote Nov 2017 #118
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #133
Just WOW!!! Et tu Elizabeth?! InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #3
I think she said it because it's true. mpcamb Nov 2017 #112
I agree... was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #125
I just love the so called progressives comradebillyboy Nov 2017 #4
This is ridiculous. LisaM Nov 2017 #6
I'm glad my Senator answered the question as she saw fit. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #10
I like Elizabeth Warren, but I cannot understand how she can think the primary was rigged. LisaM Nov 2017 #16
I'm sure it won't the last time she's asked. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #20
Whether you agree or disagree with Elizabeth, you have to admire her honesty... InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #54
yeah I really hope we can avoid a focus group tested candidate. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #76
You can blaze your own trail to a dead end or quicksand, as well. I don't think she is as LuvLoogie Nov 2017 #110
Brazille, Warren, others are trying to keep Hillary from running again. n/m RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #21
Hasnt Hillary already stated that shes not running again? truthisfreedom Nov 2017 #39
I think she's stated that before this past election as well RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #43
Maybe, but i take Hillary at her word on this. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #61
Yes, and we should respect Hillary's decision to yield the political stage to others. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #57
Yes, Hillary clearly said she will not run again. riversedge Nov 2017 #74
Elizabeth Warren has a long way to go, and she is not going to get there by alienating LuvLoogie Nov 2017 #109
Not the first time she has stepped in it--so to speak pandr32 Nov 2017 #129
Franken....... SergeStorms Nov 2017 #132
At this point maybe Hillary needs to take one for the team Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #7
The Clinton name certainly draws much attention groundloop Nov 2017 #29
Elizabeth has a LOT of credibility with me!! When she speaks, people DO tend to listen. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #66
Donna is the one who's contract was terminated with CNN for giving HRC the questions underthematrix Nov 2017 #8
No, they said that Donna Brazile leaked one question to the campaign LisaM Nov 2017 #18
In the article I read, Donna BRazile did this three times and lied about it over and over again on underthematrix Nov 2017 #22
I think you nailed it. LisaM Nov 2017 #33
She has admitted doing this. CentralMass Nov 2017 #106
This isn't helpful, even if true. It doesn't matter what Warren thinks about that. Honeycombe8 Nov 2017 #9
If we don't beat Trump in 2020... Pugster Nov 2017 #11
Trump won't make it until 2020. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #23
Republicans won't impeach him Pugster Nov 2017 #27
I think they will. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #40
I don't believe they will The Genealogist Nov 2017 #115
Oh they will Drahthaardogs Nov 2017 #122
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #12
Cow? Really? frazzled Nov 2017 #15
In what specific ways were the primaries rigged? frazzled Nov 2017 #13
That is one of my issues dbackjon Nov 2017 #25
Rigging doesn't have to be criminal. thesquanderer Nov 2017 #75
So you are saying Hillary cheated? sheshe2 Nov 2017 #90
Donna Brazile's point is that it was not an even playing field. thesquanderer Nov 2017 #105
Yet if you put your thumb on the scale to change the weight and balance... sheshe2 Nov 2017 #108
Do you like uneven playing field better? thesquanderer Nov 2017 #113
Mikulski Commission and the Fairness Commission joshcryer Nov 2017 #30
This sounds like.. LeonardShelby Nov 2017 #41
The rigging in question was discussed here... thesquanderer Nov 2017 #79
I doubt they were any more rigged than the general election. David__77 Nov 2017 #100
She didn't sugar coat it. She didn't run it by a focus group. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #14
We need Democrats implying false criminality on other Democrats? dbackjon Nov 2017 #26
nobody said anything about criminality. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #47
Rigging means Fraud. Implies Criminality. dbackjon Nov 2017 #48
Or it can mean unethical but not criminal like the book says. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #51
No dbackjon Nov 2017 #58
Even DB, to her credit, admitted there was no criminality involved. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #70
Elizabeth says that the party should support all Democrats. Bernie isn't a Democrat anymore pnwmom Nov 2017 #19
I'm reminded of this quote from a recent Daily Beast post NurseJackie Nov 2017 #28
"He's loyal to a set of ideas" humbled_opinion Nov 2017 #38
Winning elections and defeating Republicans is more important than vanity-votes and lost causes. NurseJackie Nov 2017 #49
I strongly disagree. pnwmom Nov 2017 #52
K & R! n/t billh58 Nov 2017 #42
And therein lies the billh58 Nov 2017 #37
Actually it wasn't the "end of story" AncientGeezer Nov 2017 #56
It was the end billh58 Nov 2017 #73
Hard not to admit the humbled_opinion Nov 2017 #31
What are you talking about? Donna Brazile debunked the false "rigged" and "biased DNC" narrative emulatorloo Nov 2017 #82
Sometimes the truth hurts left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #34
yes. better now than Nov 2 2018 or 2020. Cobalt Violet Nov 2017 #50
But that's simply not what Warren said. In fact, in that entire 1:25 video, she never even said... George II Nov 2017 #35
Thank you George. The Hill notoriously likes to stir the pot. emulatorloo Nov 2017 #84
What? melman Nov 2017 #96
That's not the question that the Hill article said Jake Tapper asked her. George II Nov 2017 #111
Yes melman Nov 2017 #119
Couldnt she have just said that it was time to move forward dhol82 Nov 2017 #36
Whatever, if Warren runs, I'm voting for her. HopeAgain Nov 2017 #55
I'm with YOU, though, obviously, it also depends on who else is running. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #63
"Elizabeth would clean the Orange Nazi's clock!! LenaBaby61 Nov 2017 #116
I agree we need to combat voter suppression BIGLY, as that squatter in the White House would say... InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #123
To bad, it did not work. She lost. bigly BrainMann1 Nov 2017 #67
Haven't we known this??? ileus Nov 2017 #68
Who gives a Fuck?? maxrandb Nov 2017 #71
Good one. mpcamb Nov 2017 #102
Good to know. I disagree with Warren. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author Wwcd Nov 2017 #83
Trojan horse? melman Nov 2017 #88
She was the only Democrat, so it's a moot point. She would easily win against anyone else running. Lil Missy Nov 2017 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author Wwcd Nov 2017 #95
Warren is just pissed she didn't run in 2016 when it was her best shot BluegrassDem Nov 2017 #93
I agree with her, essentially. David__77 Nov 2017 #97
I expect Elizabeth will be "clarifying" this shortly. nt SunSeeker Nov 2017 #101
Why can't we get past all this bullshit NoMoreRepugs Nov 2017 #103
It was rigged by the 20th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act BainsBane Nov 2017 #107
Let's Just Argue RobinA Nov 2017 #114
We knew about this at the time. Old news. Get over it. Kablooie Nov 2017 #117
NOT helpful...except for Trump and the GOP, even the alt-right. highplainsdem Nov 2017 #121
Well this is one of those things where we take sides and will never agree yet we may get some of wasupaloopa Nov 2017 #126
Et tu, Senator Warren? Paladin Nov 2017 #134
It's not "throw Hillary under the bus day," it's "let's get our priorities straight day" yurbud Nov 2017 #135
Interesting thread ripcord Nov 2017 #141
I'll just leave this here: Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #142
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Warren agrees that 2016 D...»Reply #69