Latest Breaking News

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

42. NOW we know it's unethical?

Reply to onit2day (Reply #20)

Fri Nov 3, 2017, 11:43 AM

Nov 2017

Not sure who "we" is in that sentence... most Democrats would have known that it was unethical from the beginning.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats express outrage over allegations of early party control for Clinton in 2016 [View all] Omaha Steve Nov 2017 OP

. stonecutter357 Nov 2017 #1

That was a laudable goal when the rule was created FBaggins Nov 2017 #15

Identifying problems with the party's primary is onit2day Nov 2017 #20

Does the GOP have a similar arrangement? Not Ruth Nov 2017 #26

Of course not FBaggins Nov 2017 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author moda253 Nov 2017 #38

NOW we know it's unethical? FBaggins Nov 2017 #42

Doesn't this line of comments smell like it started with Russian bot crap instigators? Rene Nov 2017 #39

yes the Republicans are pretending "outrage" too OKNancy Nov 2017 #2

drats. Of course Trump would jump on this!! Now riversedge Nov 2017 #8

What did you expect from Trump. Nothing illegal was done onit2day Nov 2017 #21

I'm outraged that any Dems are trying to divide the party at a critical time. highplainsdem Nov 2017 #3

The party could unite in condemnation of secret campaign control of DNC. David__77 Nov 2017 #4

"Secret". OilemFirchen Nov 2017 #7

No. Secret. David__77 Nov 2017 #9

No secret. No secret. OilemFirchen Nov 2017 #10

Well, I hope that true and false information are distinguished. David__77 Nov 2017 #14

+1 LOL fleabiscuit Nov 2017 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author David__77 Nov 2017 #13

I agree with you. Dems have a conscience and want to do the right thing. The truth should come out. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #27

That really depends on what you mean by "control." joshcryer Nov 2017 #41

That already happened.Now we are trying to unite onit2day Nov 2017 #22

This article does a terrific job of telling the lies that they are setting out to tell. StevieM Nov 2017 #5

That is a GREAT analogy. n/t susanna Nov 2017 #16

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Skittles Nov 2017 #6

Right when we are about to boot the fuckers, snort Nov 2017 #12

It looks like there's a strong concern here about unifying the Dem party. davsand Nov 2017 #17

They ought to be outraged that they weren't out raising money Historic NY Nov 2017 #18

If she didn't give anything to the DNC it would've blown wide the fuck open. joshcryer Nov 2017 #43

This has been painful to see on DU. fleabiscuit Nov 2017 #19

I disagree. It's unifying those that felt divided. onit2day Nov 2017 #23

She has been brilliant. (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #44

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2017 #24

K&R Owl Nov 2017 #25

Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders had been rigged ? GOOD stonecutter357 Nov 2017 #28

The 2015 Fundraising agreement videohead5 Nov 2017 #29

The smug dudebro left has been jizzing in their pants nonstop... Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #30

They're not pleasuring themselves as much as trump is. Paladin Nov 2017 #36

+1 Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #37

How fortuitous for the republicans tavernier Nov 2017 #31

Yo, Washington Post Corgigal Nov 2017 #32

You want outrage? I'm fucking done with Donna Brazile. Scoopster Nov 2017 #33

+1Million! coolsandy Nov 2017 #47

He was not and still is not a DEMOCRAT. He deservers no support from the DNC. Can't make up his Rene Nov 2017 #34

Bernie signed the exact same DNC fundraising agreement. How is this a "scandal"? SunSeeker Nov 2017 #35

where did you get that? scipan Nov 2017 #45

The Bernie campaign signed a JFA (Joint Fundraising Agreement) in November 2015. SunSeeker Nov 2017 #46