Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
153. Really? Then get back on the TV and straighten this shit out DONNA.
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 02:15 PM
Nov 2017

Enjoy your money.
Trump loves all you did for him.

So Hillary worked the system so she could win the nomination? Botany Nov 2017 #1
She was the overwhelming choice even in 2013/2014 before any of this happened karynnj Nov 2017 #28
It raises many interesting questions harun Nov 2017 #143
Interesting points karynnj Nov 2017 #144
I read that she cravenly "worked closely" with people "inside the beltway" for decades ehrnst Nov 2017 #46
"Then I found this agreement." You keep leaving that last sentence off. scipan Nov 2017 #113
She didn't become party chair until July 2016 - after Clinton became the nominee ehrnst Nov 2017 #141
This nt Kahuna7 Nov 2017 #127
Oh, this is helpful n/t obamanut2012 Nov 2017 #2
Why are we posting this here on DU? There is no need to propagate more trash about Clinton bitterross Nov 2017 #3
The original is posted on politico. woundedkarma Nov 2017 #9
Do you know who Donna Brazile is? RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #16
She replaced DWS as DNC chair following her removal. Tiggeroshii Nov 2017 #18
I was asking the person screaming that this shouldnt.... RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #19
Yeah... I got that a little after I posted but kept it as an FYI for anybody that needed it Tiggeroshii Nov 2017 #124
It's all good! RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #126
I'm quite certain I do know bitterross Nov 2017 #162
MSNBC reporting on it not more than an hour ago. 7962 Nov 2017 #25
On the contrary, it matters a great deal. RandomAccess Nov 2017 #35
Not seeing where corruption is mentioned. ehrnst Nov 2017 #41
What would you call it? RandomAccess Nov 2017 #43
You need to specify what part of the post you are talking about ehrnst Nov 2017 #44
It doesn't have to be technically illegal for it to be corrupt RandomAccess Nov 2017 #47
Um... like this part here? ehrnst Nov 2017 #48
"Then I found this agreement." You keep leaving that last sentence off. scipan Nov 2017 #111
And does that sentence negate what she said before? ehrnst Nov 2017 #112
Right, and it doesn't actually have to be killing an infant to "murder a baby" ehrnst Nov 2017 #49
Well, we will disagree about that RandomAccess Nov 2017 #51
Soap opera writing sells. ehrnst Nov 2017 #53
And authoritarianism works too -- with some people RandomAccess Nov 2017 #66
I complete understand your need to conflate authoritarianism and an opinion different than yours. LanternWaste Nov 2017 #75
I don't mind a different opinion RandomAccess Nov 2017 #80
Me too. Which is why I supported HRC in 2016. ehrnst Nov 2017 #114
Don't let your bias outweigh rational though. LanternWaste Nov 2017 #74
Funny - RandomAccess Nov 2017 #81
Well, until Brazile offers evidence that the agreement she read ehrnst Nov 2017 #139
Bull shit to sell a book wasupaloopa Nov 2017 #67
This is the way it worked that was out of order onit2day Nov 2017 #65
If it was "unethical" why did the DNC make public in August 2015? ehrnst Nov 2017 #115
. Squinch Nov 2017 #118
this TalenaGor Nov 2017 #58
1+, 1+, 1+, 1+, 1+ LovingA2andMI Nov 2017 #108
ITS FREAKING DIVERSION! bitterross Nov 2017 #161
earlier.. this was called analysis. woundedkarma Nov 2017 #4
Well, now... and later... it's called BS DIVERSION from what is important. bitterross Nov 2017 #6
This is NOT a right-wing diversion story TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #27
+1 Owl Nov 2017 #134
This is the reason I said this! bitterross Nov 2017 #160
it was pulled off because they didn't follow posting rules plus the poster was banned OKNancy Nov 2017 #7
that's about... woundedkarma Nov 2017 #10
we've had the same LBN posting rules forever OKNancy Nov 2017 #12
No doubt, your surprise at threads locked for breaking rules is most sincere. LanternWaste Nov 2017 #20
Keeping the same rules as always? (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #42
that black hole is called mopinko Nov 2017 #23
This must be MFM008 Nov 2017 #5
This explains why Donna leaked questions during the debate Red Oak Nov 2017 #8
So Brazile rigged a debate, lost her job delisen Nov 2017 #29
Rigged a debate? ehrnst Nov 2017 #50
She didn't "rig" a debate, exactly. But you remember... Honeycombe8 Nov 2017 #64
Isn't only heard it was about the water in Flint, so of course they knew that was coming. bettyellen Nov 2017 #129
DB's croc tears are about Brazile, not HRC. Red Oak Nov 2017 #60
Ouch. awesomerwb1 Nov 2017 #34
How horrible romana Nov 2017 #11
well, well, well LittleGirl Nov 2017 #13
Sometimes the truth hurts left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #14
+1 TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #21
+1 Oneironaut Nov 2017 #22
+1 KPN Nov 2017 #33
Julian Assange is suddenly in love with her now, too. ehrnst Nov 2017 #39
+1 janterry Nov 2017 #63
"The truth will set you free -- RandomAccess Nov 2017 #68
It's funny to see how many haters of Brazile became instant lovers Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #71
I don't know these tweeters - why should I care? left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #92
Only you can answer that... Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #93
So why didn't she fucking say anything last year? Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #76
Because she didn't uncover the contract between the DNC and Clinton TexasBushwhacker Nov 2017 #106
And now she's pimping her book five days before elections... Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #121
+1 harun Nov 2017 #98
+1 LiberalLovinLug Nov 2017 #103
1+ LovingA2andMI Nov 2017 #104
+9000 Kimchijeon Nov 2017 #157
+1 Raine Nov 2017 #163
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #15
News isn't news if they don't like it, to some here. 7962 Nov 2017 #24
1+ LovingA2andMI Nov 2017 #105
And look what happened. 7962 Nov 2017 #132
WOW!!!! LovingA2andMI Nov 2017 #145
I was on that jury... CTyankee Nov 2017 #38
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #55
I hate these infights...I don't post a lot because you never know how it will all CTyankee Nov 2017 #61
Wow.....you see the results. 7962 Nov 2017 #131
No kidding. it's getting fucking ridiculous. nt m-lekktor Nov 2017 #54
Like it or not, this is a big story RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #17
I've never thought much of Donna Brazile as a Democratic Strategist, talk show panelist TheDebbieDee Nov 2017 #26
Brazile turned to Karl Rove after the 2000 election delisen Nov 2017 #32
I haven't read the Brazile book but we all have to be discerning about readily accepting TheDebbieDee Nov 2017 #45
Umm.... LovingA2andMI Nov 2017 #107
WOW... Ligyron Nov 2017 #30
Bernie still had a lot of money videohead5 Nov 2017 #31
Really not about Sanders zipplewrath Nov 2017 #82
The Hill headlines are always reliably descriptive of the main point of the article ehrnst Nov 2017 #36
I'd like to see The Hill's excerpts in the context of the entire book. George II Nov 2017 #37
Especially the one that contradicts the headline.... ehrnst Nov 2017 #57
"Then I found this agreement." You keep leaving that last sentence off. scipan Nov 2017 #110
Im sorry, really? MrScorpio Nov 2017 #40
GOOD Democratic party members only thanks... stonecutter357 Nov 2017 #52
Interesting - she says that she found no evidence of rigging in the actual exerpt... ehrnst Nov 2017 #56
And then she says she found it. You stopped reading. 7962 Nov 2017 #133
I didn't stop reading. I read the whole thing. ehrnst Nov 2017 #135
OK, THAT was excellent. "Put on music & light candles.." Kudos. 7962 Nov 2017 #136
Give credit to Brazile. Of course if you read the article, you would know that she wrote that. ehrnst Nov 2017 #138
Jeeze, thats what I get for reading it on the phone. I swear I read the whole thing!! 7962 Nov 2017 #155
Indeed.(nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #156
It seems to bother her that she feels Clinton had an unfair advantage during the primaries. hughee99 Nov 2017 #59
I'm sorry, but I don't see the "bombshell." It just looks like a bailout. Bleacher Creature Nov 2017 #62
Uh, not quite RandomAccess Nov 2017 #85
All I'm seeing is Brazile's spin on that agreement. Bleacher Creature Nov 2017 #109
That's what was reported at the time RandomAccess Nov 2017 #120
all that was reported was a "tight rein on spending" questionseverything Nov 2017 #123
Let me put it this way RandomAccess Nov 2017 #125
the copy/paste i posted was from this questionseverything Nov 2017 #128
So Clinton agreed to help the DNC. Freethinker65 Nov 2017 #69
In LBN, one isn't supposed to modify the title of the article which was done here. Kaleva Nov 2017 #70
I love that the cross-section of people who believe beyond a doubt Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #72
Donna didn't say that Hillary rigged the primary Kaleva Nov 2017 #79
Sadly the narrative is out there now Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #83
This is just an attempt at distraction. It won't slow down Mueller. Kaleva Nov 2017 #86
I believe that Mueller's actions have EVERYTHING to do with a thread like this. (nt) Paladin Nov 2017 #87
It won't distract the people that really matter like Mueller and his legal team. Kaleva Nov 2017 #90
Maybe not. But it keeps the Democratic Party in non-stop turmoil. Paladin Nov 2017 #94
A lot about Hillary controlling funding, but nothing about how it affected the nomination muriel_volestrangler Nov 2017 #73
I don't know that whatever question Brazile fed to the campaign mattered.... LisaM Nov 2017 #78
+1 I agree, and well said FakeNoose Nov 2017 #89
Well, exactly. Those were some very obvious questions that Hillary clearly didn't need. LisaL Nov 2017 #137
Every Party ever would prefer to have one strong candidate rather than a difficult primary MGKrebs Nov 2017 #77
Hmm, I guess I called that one. MGKrebs Nov 2017 #116
This is exhausting. MontanaMama Nov 2017 #84
RW media and the deplorables are loving this. highplainsdem Nov 2017 #88
So, to recap: Blue_Tires Nov 2017 #91
Despite edit, OP still isn't following LBN rules about posting headlines Kaleva Nov 2017 #95
They used the right title, not breaking rules. harun Nov 2017 #99
Note the difference between your title and the title of the OP Kaleva Nov 2017 #101
The quote marks difference? Rest is same, isn't it? harun Nov 2017 #142
Quotation marks are important. Kaleva Nov 2017 #149
What you wrote is correct. Kaleva Nov 2017 #102
Jose, Thank you, saidsimplesimon Nov 2017 #96
There are a remarkable number of people commenting on this OP who have less than 500 posts Justice Nov 2017 #97
And look at how the OP changed the title of the article Kaleva Nov 2017 #100
Things that make you go, "Hmmmmm......" Squinch Nov 2017 #117
Heres the reform the Democratic Party needs: never, ever allow a non-Democrat NYC Liberal Nov 2017 #119
That's the thing I'll never understand, how that is allowed. OnDoutside Nov 2017 #122
Horrible idea that would make corruption worse, not better. harun Nov 2017 #146
Oh really? So all Democrats are corrupt? NYC Liberal Nov 2017 #150
Roll through these charts and form your own opinion on if there is a corruption problem harun Nov 2017 #154
That's completely and totally irrelevant to what I was talking about. NYC Liberal Nov 2017 #164
You claimed I was saying all Democrats are corrupt, which I didn't. harun Nov 2017 #165
If I had a suspicious mind dflprincess Nov 2017 #130
Donna Brazile was Al Gore's campaign mgr DeminPennswoods Nov 2017 #140
Twitter - DB just said primary system was NOT rigged. Raissa Nov 2017 #147
Really? Then get back on the TV and straighten this shit out DONNA. Wwcd Nov 2017 #153
Donna Brazile has a book to sell BlueIdaho Nov 2017 #148
With Trump destroying the country I have no outrage to spare for this. 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2017 #151
Brazile is lying JCannon Nov 2017 #152
Memo surfaced Bradical79 Nov 2017 #158
Brazile's claim shown to be untrue Bradical79 Nov 2017 #159
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Brazile: 'Proof' that Cli...»Reply #153