Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Princess Turandot

(4,907 posts)
21. Back on October 2, Planned Parenthood withdrew their request for a SCOTUS injunction...
Wed Nov 8, 2017, 04:47 AM
Nov 2017

...because after clarifying that their 9/22 order was only a temporary stay pending a review, the full 8th Circuit DENIED Missouri's request to freeze the District Court's ruling that the law was unconstitutional, pending the state's appeal of that decision:

Planned Parenthood withdraws application in Missouri case

A challenge to two Missouri abortion requirements has ended its trip to the Supreme Court – at least for now. Attorneys for Planned Parenthood notified the Supreme Court tonight that they were withdrawing their request to block a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit after that court ruled in the group’s favor. Today’s order means that a decision by a federal district judge that blocked the state from enforcing two of its abortion requirements can go into effect while the state appeals the district court’s ruling.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/10/planned-parenthood-withdraws-application-missouri-case/

This was never going to be up to Gorsuch alone. If he denied their request, PP would have requested that another justice take a look at it. On the most contentious topics (i.e. abortion, death penalty stays, gay rights), the justice for the district that gets the initial request usually refers it promptly to the full court to stay everyone's time. (At most, they might ask for the other party to respond to the issue, since that's generally needed.) I don't know if he would have done that as it's convention not an actual 'rule', but the next judge would have.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you don't believe in abortion, then don't have one. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2017 #1
Very well-said. Kath2 Sep 2017 #8
Some years back, a young friend (he was maybe 12 at the time) who loved PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2017 #9
I have relationships like that, too. Kath2 Sep 2017 #15
"They are in my life to help me understand that we need to not judge others...." mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2017 #17
"What a lie that is".... SergeStorms Sep 2017 #11
If babies were born in uniform HAB911 Sep 2017 #14
I give u thre guesses where his shit falls,,,,,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2017 #2
i think bluestarone Sep 2017 #3
He is worse than Scalia. BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #4
Hail, Gorsuch. Put into a formerly respected position by an insane, grotesque, perverted dirtbag. Judi Lynn Sep 2017 #5
Stolen seat sharedvalues Sep 2017 #6
Yes, the seat was stolen burrowowl Sep 2017 #10
And Gorsuch is now campaigning for McConnell. He's a GOP politician now. sharedvalues Sep 2017 #7
He's uber religious, isn't he? He's pro-life. Trump said he'd nominate someone who is pro-life.nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2017 #12
Yowsa.... Funtatlaguy Sep 2017 #13
Well, that's a civics lesson for me Bayard Sep 2017 #16
I am sick of these idiots trying to make the rules for women's bodies. demigoddess Sep 2017 #18
guess this wasn't written yet? Sunlei Nov 2017 #19
does anyone know if Gorsuch has written his opinion yet? Sunlei Nov 2017 #20
Back on October 2, Planned Parenthood withdrew their request for a SCOTUS injunction... Princess Turandot Nov 2017 #21
Thank you & thanks for link to scotusblog. Sunlei Nov 2017 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Neil Gorsuch's views on a...»Reply #21