Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's on now!!! MaryMagdaline Nov 2017 #1
I wouldn't hand it over to him either MiniMe Nov 2017 #2
In fairness, his lawyer suggested a neutral party take custody of the book PJMcK Nov 2017 #4
I wonder what Moore's concept of a "neutral party" is. Paladin Nov 2017 #10
no, they are worried that YOU, you disgusting pedo, will fake something. niyad Nov 2017 #3
Here's a thought PJMcK Nov 2017 #5
Moore wants a high school yearbook with photos of young girls? left-of-center2012 Nov 2017 #6
More Selective Amnesia By A Brain Dead Repub SoCalMusicLover Nov 2017 #7
when truth is not on your side mikeysnot Nov 2017 #12
Wolf Blitzer asked Gloria Allred several times if she could state it wasn't a fake signature 7962 Nov 2017 #8
About The Yearbook Cheviteau Nov 2017 #9
But why the insistence on a Senate hearing? 7962 Nov 2017 #14
She's keeping it alive so it becomes part of the conversation underpants Nov 2017 #27
But she's wasting time asking for something thats not going to happen. Its the "Gloria Show" 7962 Nov 2017 #30
Allred is blowing this thing so poorly, I have to wonder if it wasn't Moore himself who hired her. EL34x4 Nov 2017 #18
That os preposterous. She wanted her face on TV being proven Wrong? moda253 Nov 2017 #19
Gloria Allred is an opportunist "celebrity lawyer" who thinks that any publicity is good publicity. EL34x4 Nov 2017 #23
I completely agree. And if this 1 woman story falls apart, 7962 Nov 2017 #21
I've seen no reputable source saying there are any inconsistencies underpants Nov 2017 #28
I didn't need a "reputable source" to tell me it looks shady as hell. EL34x4 Nov 2017 #37
I did too underpants Nov 2017 #38
If.. kwalter66 Nov 2017 #25
Can't a handwriting comparison MichMary Nov 2017 #32
Not entirely FBaggins Nov 2017 #33
Since rules nor laws don't pertain to roy, I'd assume he would deface the book. Lil Missy Nov 2017 #11
The note from the yearbook is online. People can analize the signature all they want. rgbecker Nov 2017 #13
The problem is they did and thought it looked fake. And it does. EL34x4 Nov 2017 #24
oh crap, he wasn't the D.A. when he signed it??? Definitely not good. nt 7962 Nov 2017 #31
He was a deputy DA. FBaggins Nov 2017 #34
All of that makes sense. But if it turns out to be altered, the tide will turn against the others. 7962 Nov 2017 #35
That's probably why they have resisted releasing it FBaggins Nov 2017 #36
The sweaty little weasel is grasping for straws. If only he could face jail marble falls Nov 2017 #15
Why wont Roy Moore take a polygraph test? Zorro Nov 2017 #16
polygraph isnt allowed in court is it? moda253 Nov 2017 #20
No they're not. And for good reason. Theyre not terribly hard to beat. 7962 Nov 2017 #22
Gloria Allred is not going to hand over her evidence without getting something big in return Heather MC Nov 2017 #17
She is playing like I would kwalter66 Nov 2017 #29
Do not give... Mike Nelson Nov 2017 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Roy Moore claims accuser ...»Reply #38