Latest Breaking News

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)

62. WTF!

Reply to questionseverything (Reply #58)

Tue Dec 12, 2017, 04:25 AM

Dec 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alabama Court Injunction: Preserve ALL Ballots [View all] laserhaas Dec 2017 OP

repubes outraged Achilleaze Dec 2017 #1

Scrambling - for sure. laserhaas Dec 2017 #2

ty 4 posting questionseverything Dec 2017 #51

Dems have to do this across the country from now on. brush Dec 2017 #57

now alabama supremes struck it down questionseverything Dec 2017 #58

WTF! laserhaas Dec 2017 #62

Interesting development especially pro-actively nm AmericanActivist Dec 2017 #3

E actly laserhaas Dec 2017 #44

Great News! leftieNanner Dec 2017 #4

There were 2 HBO documentaries about destroyed records laserhaas Dec 2017 #7

THIS takes a court injuction? LiberalLovinLug Dec 2017 #5

One would think laserhaas Dec 2017 #8

it is about access questionseverything Dec 2017 #54

that will piss Pootie off Motley13 Dec 2017 #6

So let it be written...let it get done laserhaas Dec 2017 #45

So, of course ... Jopin Klobe Dec 2017 #9

I know...my thoughts laserhaas Dec 2017 #11

Actually, originals already kept by law. yallerdawg Dec 2017 #15

But they have habits of being lost laserhaas Dec 2017 #23

The last sentence tells the story. Wellstone ruled Dec 2017 #26

That's a great thingy laserhaas Dec 2017 #46

not exactly questionseverything Dec 2017 #52

K&R...Thanks for posting red dog 1 Dec 2017 #10

He still has to keep zipped lips laserhaas Dec 2017 #12

K and R!!!!!!! BadgerMom Dec 2017 #13

Yup laserhaas Dec 2017 #24

Putin's not going to like this. C Moon Dec 2017 #14

Well...at least he can't throw U S. out a windiw laserhaas Dec 2017 #36

And with Putin all ready to congratulate Roy Moore Farmer-Rick Dec 2017 #16

A coo laserhaas Dec 2017 #17

surprise i love it bluestarone Dec 2017 #18

Should be this way laserhaas Dec 2017 #37

Does it matter whether or not the ballots are paper? BigmanPigman Dec 2017 #19

Think that order covers digital laserhaas Dec 2017 #21

Not as much as some people think... Wounded Bear Dec 2017 #22

People were swapping out ballots and ballot boxes a long time before there was electricity. LiberalArkie Dec 2017 #30

Yup laserhaas Dec 2017 #47

There oughta be unified system..nstionwide laserhaas Dec 2017 #38

In Alabama no less. Huge!! ffr Dec 2017 #20

Yup laserhaas Dec 2017 #48

So why is some digital "imaging" any less prone to tampering than actual ballots? Seriously. ancianita Dec 2017 #25

Previously...losing parties did minimum due diligence laserhaas Dec 2017 #39

this is why questionseverything Dec 2017 #53

Thanks ancianita Dec 2017 #66

"Voter Suppression Will Play a Crucial Role in Alabama Senate Race" red dog 1 Dec 2017 #27

And 2018 and 2020 laserhaas Dec 2017 #40

Will that tell anyone anything? Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #28

No, apparently, it's the ballots themselves RandomAccess Dec 2017 #31

That's what I said. IMAGES of the electronic voting. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #33

brad blog explains questionseverything Dec 2017 #55

Actual paper ballots were preserved and recounted in FL in 2000. ??? Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #65

Images are not expensive. They're digital. Easily storable. My problem is that images can be made up ancianita Dec 2017 #68

it is about transparency and complying with federal law questionseverything Dec 2017 #71

the macines already have the imaging..it is a matter of preserving them questionseverything Dec 2017 #70

Then..by 21st laserhaas Dec 2017 #49

Due diligence is helpful laserhaas Dec 2017 #41

Hooray, Hooray, HOORAY RandomAccess Dec 2017 #29

Taking Alabama Senate seat laserhaas Dec 2017 #42

They have paper ballots in Alabama? McCamy Taylor Dec 2017 #32

Paper ballots weren't ordered preserved. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #34

Ummm...where did you see that? laserhaas Dec 2017 #50

Those links in the OP don't point to the actual legislation or request.... Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #64

ballots are preserved but we cant look at them w/o proving fraud questionseverything Dec 2017 #56

If that language reported in the post is correct, it doesn't request paper ballots preserved. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #63

Looking into it laserhaas Dec 2017 #43

What kind of dirty trick is that? Turbineguy Dec 2017 #35

Ha Ha laserhaas Dec 2017 #61

Per Greg Palast - Alabama Supreme Court over-ruled this... TheDebbieDee Dec 2017 #59

Boy Republicans sure hate fair and honest elections, don't they? Kablooie Dec 2017 #60

it would just take ONE federal Supreme to stay that stay wouldn't it? yurbud Dec 2017 #67

There will be 2 sets of ballots FakeNoose Dec 2017 #73

Does that not include provisional and absentee ballots? THat's where they get them. Those Amaryllis Dec 2017 #69

How in the fruk ...does a court go on the record laserhaas Dec 2017 #72

Moore lost laserhaas Dec 2017 #74