Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
36. Literalism is a convenient thing...
Thu Dec 28, 2017, 04:02 PM
Dec 2017

"But his own holy book denounces the practice of public prayer!"

Literalism is a convenient thing... we mock others for its use when we practice the same; only our biases maintain the pretense of difference.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Most of the time these bans are in result of... Xolodno Dec 2017 #1
Throw him in jail until the Second Coming Angry Dragon Dec 2017 #2
sounds like a good idea Matthew28 Dec 2017 #3
Gosh, this guy needs to get a little solidarity from the Church of Satan! TygrBright Dec 2017 #4
As an agnostic with absolutely no interest in his message........ Red Mountain Dec 2017 #5
They already have churches, mosques, temples, and the Houston astrodome Submariner Dec 2017 #6
1st amendment protects their right to free speech melm00se Dec 2017 #7
Perhaps atreides1 Dec 2017 #11
Rights have no meaning if they aren't protected for those you disagree with. X_Digger Dec 2017 #17
Disturbing the Peace and harassment of others is not protected speech. MarcA Dec 2017 #18
Ahh, the cop's trump card -- 'disturbing the peace'. It means whatever the fuck the cops says. X_Digger Dec 2017 #19
A lawyer stating that his client "only speaks loud enough to be heard MarcA Dec 2017 #21
Not familiar with actual 'disturbing the peace' charges, are you? X_Digger Dec 2017 #22
"But it's always surprising to see DU'ers on the wrong side of civil liberties." mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2017 #33
Sadly, we have always had a certain number of "Ronald Reagan liberals": friendly_iconoclast Dec 2017 #39
Don't talk jl_theprofessor Dec 2017 #23
Literalism is a convenient thing... LanternWaste Dec 2017 #36
There's a proper place to exercise that right. SergeStorms Dec 2017 #28
He has the right to free speech anywhere in the public arena ClarendonDem Dec 2017 #29
Yes, actually, you can. Stop using that example. It's an odious case that was overturned 40 yrs ago. X_Digger Dec 2017 #30
Facts, as presented in the article, are: melm00se Dec 2017 #31
And your problem is? shenmue Dec 2017 #8
And we already have DU and Daily Kos so we are fine too. Kaleva Dec 2017 #10
As long as their not making a nuisance of themselves... paleotn Dec 2017 #13
There is no right to not be offended. Get over it. n/t X_Digger Dec 2017 #20
You have no right in public jl_theprofessor Dec 2017 #25
I feel the same about politics: imaginary, self-destructive, more harm than good... LanternWaste Dec 2017 #35
All things religion set me off Submariner Dec 2017 #37
I agree Locrian Dec 2017 #9
He cant obstruct pedestrian traffic. djg21 Dec 2017 #45
Then he would not mind someone preaching some theology right beside him that goes against his own. keithbvadu2 Dec 2017 #12
Hand out heathenistic flyers in front of his church. paleotn Dec 2017 #14
Yes jl_theprofessor Dec 2017 #24
knowing a little abt Hotlanta,,,,,I bet the preacher was,,, Cryptoad Dec 2017 #15
Going to be a slam dunk win (says this atheist civil rights activist.) n/t X_Digger Dec 2017 #16
I hate everything these preachers rant about... brooklynite Dec 2017 #26
Free Speech Roy Rolling Dec 2017 #27
When my dog spreads the gospel on the sidewalk, aka-chmeee Dec 2017 #32
oh wow. I love your sig line gif!! niyad Dec 2017 #41
what about MY right not to be annoyed by these spewing assholes? niyad Dec 2017 #34
You have no right not to be annoyed and/or offended friendly_iconoclast Dec 2017 #38
guess that means no dropping hot coffee or a cup of ice on them then. niyad Dec 2017 #40
Imitating the actions of a bunch of virulent racists? Really? friendly_iconoclast Dec 2017 #42
That would be assault. Go ahead and try. X_Digger Dec 2017 #43
Where is that right protected? Free clue: it isn't- it doesn't exist. X_Digger Dec 2017 #44
zoning laws... greggrose Dec 2017 #47
++++++ uppityperson Dec 2017 #48
Perhaps, since their friends, the "Right" invented them, aka-chmeee Dec 2017 #46
easy one to figure out bluestarone Dec 2017 #49
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Preacher fights ban on sp...»Reply #36