Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Grand jury empaneled in Burlington College case [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Because that's what you're saying.
Or do you still not understand what a grand jury is?
Here you go:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/03/politics/what-is-a-grand-jury/index.html
Now, why don't you tell us how that "GOP operative" orchestrated a grand jury? Bringing a lawsuit is one thing, but a federal judge deciding that there was enough there to merit a grand jury is something else entirely.
And because it went several feet over your head.... Bernie should have listened to Jane's counsel on this. But he's not known for taking counsel from anyone who disagrees with him.
Jane understood the implications that an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the loan might have to a POTUS campaign, because there was enough problematic in the situation to create "bad optics." Even with no actual illegal activity on her part.
No, I didn't "imply guilt" - you did.
Is that clearer?