Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

alp227

(33,360 posts)
Wed Jan 17, 2018, 02:07 AM Jan 2018

Cost climbs by $2.8 billion for California bullet train [View all]

Source: AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The estimated cost for the first phase of California’s bullet train climbed by 35 percent on Tuesday to $10.6 billion, the latest increase for the ambitious project to run a high-speed rail line from San Francisco to Los Angeles.

The $2.8 billion price hike for a 119-mile (191-kilometer) segment in the Central Valley puts the entire cost of the project at roughly $67 billion, although officials said they hope to recover the newly announced costs later. It was projected to cost $40 billion in 2008 when voters approved bond financing.

“I want the public to count on us to tell the truth, whether it’s good, bad or ugly,” said Dan Richard, chair of the California High Speed Rail Authority’s board. “We’re going to do every single thing in our power to drive these costs down.”

Some of the fresh costs stem from trouble acquiring the rights of way for the track in the Central Valley. The authority entered into construction contracts before fully securing rights of way in all areas, a decision officials said they wouldn’t make again. The decision to enter into contracts quickly was partly due to the need to spend $2.5 billion in federal stimulus money by last fall.

Read more: https://apnews.com/0b5624b9a1684105ad48627686dda236

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the original concept was LA to SF and no local svc to the valley. hi speed to compete with msongs Jan 2018 #1
It could never compete with air travel. tinrobot Jan 2018 #23
what would it cost to add a lane on I-5 lapfog_1 Jan 2018 #2
we have enough lanes on our freeways. It is way past due that we do what Europe, China, Japan and still_one Jan 2018 #8
The Western US is not Europe and China lapfog_1 Jan 2018 #16
Get rid of the cars. The Bay Area's commute is getting worse and worse, and LA is impossible. still_one Jan 2018 #18
$4 million to $6 million per mile in rural and suburban areas... LanternWaste Jan 2018 #14
allowing for cost overruns lapfog_1 Jan 2018 #15
Initial capital investment only, so far. LanternWaste Jan 2018 #17
This country should have a network of these trains already. The_Casual_Observer Jan 2018 #3
Hear, hear! BigmanPigman Jan 2018 #4
Well, depends on what you mean by 'value' ... generation of compliant flag-waving jarhead types ... mr_lebowski Jan 2018 #5
Yes it should have. still_one Jan 2018 #9
I think that public transit projects should be exempt from environemtnal regs AlexSFCA Jan 2018 #6
...says someone who's never had to do an environmental analysis. brooklynite Jan 2018 #11
That's a fucking terrible idea. AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #12
You must not live near any mass transit lines? nt EarthFirst Jan 2018 #21
The sad thing is, by the time it is built.... yuiyoshida Jan 2018 #7
I don't think so, but regardless, it is for future generations. When the interstate highway system still_one Jan 2018 #10
So, I bet we get ours done in Texas first- Connecting Houston to Dallas snooper2 Jan 2018 #13
Many Central Valley farmers want that money spent on environmentally destructive water projects... hunter Jan 2018 #19
I rode on the SMART train for the first time today Downtown Hound Jan 2018 #20
So where's the money going to come from? ansible Jan 2018 #22
The project is dead ripcord Jan 2018 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cost climbs by $2.8 billi...