Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Nitram

(27,360 posts)

6. As a long-time conservationist, I'm not sure I understand why this change is a bad thing.

Reply to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Fri Jan 26, 2018, 11:36 AM

Jan 2018

If a polluter brings emission levels below a certain level, why not acknowledge that by reducing threat level that polluter poses? Am I missing something here?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. EPA reverses policy on 'major sources' of pollution [View all] Judi Lynn Jan 2018 OP

reduces polluters 'burden' and kills us Marthe48 Jan 2018 #1

I am so glad Macron made fun of him in Davos the other day. BigmanPigman Jan 2018 #2

"while continuing to ensure stringent and effective controls on hazardous air pollutants, yonder Jan 2018 #3

The planet will kill us before we kill it disalitervisum Jan 2018 #4

The EPA releases a new "study".... SergeStorms Jan 2018 #5

As a long-time conservationist, I'm not sure I understand why this change is a bad thing. Nitram Jan 2018 #6