Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
7. Here's the red meat (I think).
Wed Jan 31, 2018, 05:27 PM
Jan 2018

Here's the red meat (I think). From the article...

Near the top we have this:
"And he (Trump) wanted to know whether Rosenstein was "on my team."'

But this is followed later by:
"At the hearing, Rosenstein repeatedly declined to say whether Trump had ever asked him about the Russia Investigation. But he testified that he never received any "improper orders" from Trump and denied that anyone ever asked him to pledge his loyalty..."

Putting aside (what will become) the inevitable excuse of "'are you on my team' could meaning ANYTHING!!!" it seems Rosenstein denied Trump asking for loyalty when in fact, he did.




Meaning Rosenstein lied.

On edit for clarity: the hearing was AFTER the meeting with Trump.

More on edit: I cannot locate whether the December meeting was under oath or not. If it was, this could explode into perjury territory. If not, it's still a lie.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OH cilla4progress Jan 2018 #1
If it walks like collusion, talks like collusion UpInArms Jan 2018 #2
screw collusion, it looks like stalinism. unblock Jan 2018 #3
" " ' n/t MBS Jan 2018 #31
The Generals? underpants Jan 2018 #4
hahaha! quick, tell donnie we're making him a general! he'd love it! unblock Jan 2018 #6
"There is NO team...like the BEST team...which is OUR team...right here....." brooklynite Jan 2018 #5
Here's the red meat (I think). LanternWaste Jan 2018 #7
wish I could rec this post rurallib Jan 2018 #9
Why would a meeting with the preznit be "under oath"? shanny Jan 2018 #20
I doubt that's an exact equivalence bucolic_frolic Jan 2018 #25
This sounds so unbelievable for Trump to do Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2018 #8
We Democrats absolutely have to win in November if we are to preserve Sophia4 Jan 2018 #10
WE MUST WIN THE MIDTERMS! BigmanPigman Jan 2018 #11
They will win unless its stolen INdemo Jan 2018 #12
Yes! Paper ballets now!! klook Jan 2018 #18
funny !! INdemo Jan 2018 #26
Yes. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #21
THANKS. RIGHT. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #22
He doesn't need to, he is just there to carry out some agenda Perseus Jan 2018 #16
Agreed. I met a woman from Venezuela who explained the situation. Sophia4 Jan 2018 #19
How many counts of obstruction of justice is this one? nt procon Jan 2018 #13
"Of course, we're all on your team, Mr. President," Perseus Jan 2018 #14
if i were quick thinking i'd say "of course i'm on your team! america's team! u-s-a! u-s-a!" unblock Jan 2018 #15
Team USA, Mr President. Thats the FBIs team, sir. truthisfreedom Jan 2018 #17
Once Again, If Obama was caught Asking for Any Loyalty From Anyone Ccarmona Jan 2018 #23
Which indicates to me that Trump has some grander scheme in mind bucolic_frolic Jan 2018 #24
The only time this is OK gibraltar72 Jan 2018 #27
According an analyst. asking Rosenstein, "Are you on my team" is obstruction of justice. Stuart G Jan 2018 #28
Why all the 'nice' talk? "a President whose inquiries sometimes cross a line that presidents mpcamb Jan 2018 #29
he is still a reality TV show host Skittles Jan 2018 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Trump asked Ro...»Reply #7