Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Probe Lawyers Thinks Mueller Could Indict Trump [View all]RandomAccess
(5,210 posts)41. Wow. I seem to be saying that a lot lately. But WOW.
I love this, and it makes sense to me. The obstruction is SO severe and so obvious.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've said it over and over: The "tradition" that we can't indict a sitting President...
lagomorph777
Feb 2018
#1
agree, there's material evidence he obstructed and it may come down to the Supreme Court's decision
onetexan
Feb 2018
#24
Sec 3 Article 1 explicitly permits Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment.
lagomorph777
Feb 2018
#32
Distracting a President from his ongoing criminal operation is a desirable thing.
lagomorph777
Feb 2018
#35
I'd bet against it too. Impeachment maybe. Indictment, probably not no matter how much we want it.
Hoyt
Feb 2018
#2
In politics the candidate(s) who win(s) the majority of the votes is the winner.
Sophia4
Feb 2018
#37