Latest Breaking News

shanny

(6,709 posts)

41. Good question.

Wed Feb 21, 2018, 06:21 PM

Feb 2018

They asserted it in the decision and they got away with it because there is no higher review.

Fun fact, Justices are exempt from the ethical rules that apply to lower court judges. Just another set of rules / standards--like the ones the trumpettes are ignoring--that will need to be codified into law ASAP.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking: Legal Team Led by David Boies and LULAC Files Lawsuits Challenging Winner-Take-All Approa [View all] Gothmog Feb 2018 OP

Kr Fullduplexxx Feb 2018 #1

Why stop there? While we're at it, let's change us to a parlimentary system of government. :- TheBlackAdder Feb 2018 #31

Will our two major political parties support this? jalan48 Feb 2018 #2

What does have promising support is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Demit Feb 2018 #27

Sounds good to me. We don't need anymore popular vote losses. jalan48 Feb 2018 #28

imho, this is going nowhere. unblock Feb 2018 #3

Agree. The courts aren't going to touch this. Va Lefty Feb 2018 #6

Nevada and Maine split their votes nt Phoenix61 Feb 2018 #7

I think it's Nebraska and Maine LeftInTX Feb 2018 #9

you are correct gopiscrap Feb 2018 #21

Agree, with gerrymandering this could enhance the GOP advantage bigbrother05 Feb 2018 #32

nebraska and maine, yes. unblock Feb 2018 #10

I believe this is in federal court, so it can challenge the constitutionality LeftInTX Feb 2018 #25

Equal representation also must happen within a state. tinrobot Feb 2018 #16

equality under the law doesn't demand proportional results. unblock Feb 2018 #23

But governorship and senate seats can't be shared, so that's irrelevant muriel_volestrangler Feb 2018 #42

well i'm certainly liking what's going on in pennsylvania regarding gerrymandered districts unblock Feb 2018 #44

The is the originalist approach. Times change. Like with firearms from 200 years ago and today. Fred Sanders Feb 2018 #17

well if you're talking about *amending* the constitution, then sure. unblock Feb 2018 #19

This has promise genxlib Feb 2018 #4

i think it would be bad for the democratic party. unblock Feb 2018 #8

We're not close to getting Texas flipped. LeftInTX Feb 2018 #12

well not this week. unblock Feb 2018 #13

I'll quibble over years and aim for 2028 Pope George Ringo II Feb 2018 #29

No question genxlib Feb 2018 #20

Wow. Godspeed to them! Squinch Feb 2018 #5

i hope they fail. unblock Feb 2018 #11

+1 lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #36

Sorry - they haven't got a prayer... brooklynite Feb 2018 #14

True as far as it goes shanny Feb 2018 #22

"Equal Protection" was falsely cited in Bush v. Gore; now it's time to right that. lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #37

I agree. shanny Feb 2018 #38

"Set no precedent." lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #39

Good question. shanny Feb 2018 #41

So the Supremes are above the law. lagomorph777 Feb 2018 #45

The Supremes basically are above the law Yupster Feb 2018 #48

There doesn't even have to be a vote for president Yupster Feb 2018 #47

Here's to hope..... spicysista Feb 2018 #15

I have long wondered if Mme. Defarge Feb 2018 #18

there is a danger here flyingfysh Feb 2018 #24

David Boies of Bush v Gore fame? Doremus Feb 2018 #26

this basically throws it to the house district maps getagrip_already Feb 2018 #30

if you like this idea... tomp Feb 2018 #33

My dream, which I've posted here before, MurrayDelph Feb 2018 #34

"but we're getting close to flipping texas anyway" summer_in_TX Feb 2018 #35

From Prof Hasen Gothmog Feb 2018 #40

it's david boies Hermit-The-Prog Feb 2018 #43

Texas: In lawsuit, activists say Texas winner-take-all approach to the Electoral College is discri Gothmog Feb 2018 #46