Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Perry flubs name, number of Supreme Court justices [View all]teddy51
(3,491 posts)56. Personally I just think that he is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. He
may be on substance as well, but he's not very bright.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perry and several other (perhaps all) Republican Presidential candidates would likely fail that test
LonePirate
Dec 2011
#3
Dasher, Donner, Prancer, Sleepy, Weepy, Doc, Something-foreign-sounding and Larry the Cable Guy!
Nevernose
Dec 2011
#14
Why is anyone even bothering reporting on Perry -- we're at the bottom of
defendandprotect
Dec 2011
#16
He did, however, better on the math portion of the candidate test since he stated accurately that
24601
Dec 2011
#29
Justice "Montemayor"??? That's just sad. "Eight unelected and unaccountable judges"
yellowcanine
Dec 2011
#58
voters “are not looking for a robot that can spit out the name of every Supreme Court justice,
yellowcanine
Dec 2011
#61