Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MichMary

(1,714 posts)
4. Here is a link to a 60-page document regarding
Fri Mar 9, 2018, 09:57 AM
Mar 2018

what the police response to an active shooter situation SHOULD be:

http://www.policeforum.org/assets/docs/Critical_Issues_Series/the%20police%20response%20to%20active%20shooter%20incidents%202014.pdf

Columbine brought about a sea change in police
tactics. “Contain and negotiate” may be appropriate
for hostage incidents or situations where a person is
barricaded in a room and unable to harm victims.
But it is not appropriate for active shooter incidents.
Columbine resulted in new approaches in which
patrol officers are being trained to respond to active
shooters as quickly as possible.


This is from the article posted in the OP:
BSO policy calls for deputies to engage an active shooter and eliminate the threat.


The bottom line here is that the guy didn't do his job. Whether he could have saved any lives isn't known, but what is known is that he never even tried.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Parkland Deputy Told Cops...»Reply #4