Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Igel

(37,559 posts)

4. It doesn't say the other driver was drunk.

Reply to Corgigal (Reply #3)

Mon Mar 26, 2018, 08:52 PM

Mar 2018

You're set up to infer that.

It said, "The other driver, who had a history of violations, including drunk driving, was let go."

Similarly, it doesn't give enough details to know who was at fault. We're left to make whatever assumption we see fit. Odds are it was the other woman, but there are times when the person who gets hit is at fault.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Woman Faces Deportation After Another Woman Rear-Ends Her Car [View all] Judi Lynn Mar 2018 OP

Would they deport Melania's parents if they got in a car accident that wasn't their fault? Rollo Mar 2018 #1

Arrest the other woman also Angry Dragon Mar 2018 #2

The drunk driver was let go. Corgigal Mar 2018 #3

It doesn't say the other driver was drunk. Igel Mar 2018 #4

Sorry, and true. Corgigal Mar 2018 #5

If you rear end someone you are virtually always at fault dsc Mar 2018 #6

True, but that doesn't mean an automatic arrest. Jedi Guy Mar 2018 #7