Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aristus

(72,305 posts)
1. Sick.
Sun Apr 1, 2018, 12:52 AM
Apr 2018

There's no way those vile scumbags will ever be able to convince me they need high-capacity magazines for hunting...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sick. Aristus Apr 2018 #1
but, but.... Locrian Apr 2018 #11
In most states it is illegal to hunt with them hack89 Apr 2018 #15
Yup. GeorgeHayduke Apr 2018 #18
Can't ban bullets hack89 Apr 2018 #19
Well... GeorgeHayduke Apr 2018 #21
Not fair posting like that before my second cup of coffee! hack89 Apr 2018 #22
Have a third cup on me GeorgeHayduke Apr 2018 #25
I grew up with the Mariners hack89 Apr 2018 #26
I travel for work GeorgeHayduke Apr 2018 #28
Ammunition sellers could raise the price to $5 per bullet. forgotmylogin Apr 2018 #30
They are not stupid hack89 Apr 2018 #34
Well, you could tax them like cigarettes. rgbecker Apr 2018 #36
Defacto bans are unconstitutional hack89 Apr 2018 #37
So the already federal tax on arms and ammo is Uncontstitutional? rgbecker Apr 2018 #38
No. Using taxes to inhibit the exercise of a constitutional right is unconstitutional hack89 Apr 2018 #39
April Fools prank? Throck Apr 2018 #2
No the story is real lunasun Apr 2018 #3
White wing gunners loves them some hicap mags for their AR15s, and not for hunting animals. Hoyt Apr 2018 #4
Happy Easter. dchill Apr 2018 #5
Most AR-15 rifles sold today come with 20 or 30 round magazines. spin Apr 2018 #6
Gun nuts know there are plenty of regulations already on guns, so obviously they can be Fred Sanders Apr 2018 #10
I assume this is what you are referring to. ... spin Apr 2018 #23
Yes, selectively editing the second amendment and now cynically claiming to defend it Fred Sanders Apr 2018 #32
So, sickening. iluvtennis Apr 2018 #7
I think part of these types of actions is out of spite BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #8
I'm guessing that was a pretty expensive giveaway. tomp Apr 2018 #9
$12,000, give or take NickB79 Apr 2018 #14
Magpul, the manufacturer of the magazines samir.g Apr 2018 #16
Dammit! No grandfathering... paleotn Apr 2018 #12
The magazine ban portion of the law is pretty much unenforcable DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2018 #31
Sure, another silly gun argument easily refuted..." why bother with laws if they can easily be Fred Sanders Apr 2018 #33
I recall during the '94 ban people were making 10 rd magazines that were the same size... EL34x4 Apr 2018 #35
I thought they didn't like people getting free stuff. n/t malthaussen Apr 2018 #13
I hope they can track who accepted those magazines samir.g Apr 2018 #17
Never happen hack89 Apr 2018 #20
until it does samir.g Apr 2018 #24
ok. nt hack89 Apr 2018 #27
Magazines don't have serial numbers NickB79 Apr 2018 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Free high-capacity magazi...»Reply #1