Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Mosby

(19,491 posts)
8. this judge is going rogue in his old age
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 11:50 PM
Aug 2012
Is Judge Jack B Weinstein Right about Child Porn?

Last Friday's NY Times reports that Judge Jack B. Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed "no risk to society."

There is little public sympathy, for collectors of child pornography. Yet across the country, an increasing number of federal judges have come to their defense, criticizing changes to sentencing laws that have effectively quadrupled their average prison term over the last decade.

Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a 20-year child pornography sentence by ruling that the sentencing guidelines for such cases, "unless applied with great care, can lead to unreasonable sentences." The decision noted that the recommended sentences for looking at pictures of children being sexually abused sometimes eclipse those for actually sexually abusing a child.

Judge Weinstein has gone to extraordinary lengths to challenge the strict punishments, issuing a series of rulings that directly attack the mandatory five-year prison sentence faced by defendants charged with receiving child pornography.
"I don't approve of child pornography, obviously," he said in an interview this week. But, he also said, he does not believe that those who view the images, as opposed to producing or selling them, present a threat to children.

"We're destroying lives unnecessarily," he said. "At the most, they should be receiving treatment and supervision."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/my-mother-my-father-my-money/201005/is-judge-jack-b-weinstein-right-about-child-porn

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

what? DJFrey Aug 2012 #1
Actually makes sense kurt_cagle Aug 2012 #5
How do you define gambling? lunatica Aug 2012 #16
I say those definitions don't fit poker wysimdnwyg Aug 2012 #20
Blackjack is also a game of skill William Seger Aug 2012 #18
In poker, you're not playing the cards. AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #13
How does gambling not fit poker? lunatica Aug 2012 #17
Dictionary definition and legal definition are not always the same thing. AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #27
Which you then fold. Duh. cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #25
Poker is about betting. nt ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #31
Playing ANY card games should not be illegal. kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #2
Far-reaching implications oberliner Aug 2012 #3
One can hope. ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #24
I've got mixed feelings oberliner Aug 2012 #33
Still a damn FELONY in Washington State. AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #28
That's crazy oberliner Aug 2012 #32
About frigging time someone figured that out. OnlinePoker Aug 2012 #4
The "free" bit is usually read as "free to impose a puritanical way of life on others." harmonicon Aug 2012 #11
"Free" meaning "you are free to make 1% casino corporations rich." closeupready Aug 2012 #23
If he hadnt ruled that way the NYSE would have to be closed DJ13 Aug 2012 #6
Good ruling. Poker is great highly intellectual game if skill. Lucky Luciano Aug 2012 #7
this judge is going rogue in his old age Mosby Aug 2012 #8
Thanks for your post. I didn't know that about Judge Weinstein... Proletariatprincess Aug 2012 #12
Poker is not gambling but defacto7 Aug 2012 #9
You can do online poker against human opponents. AtheistCrusader Aug 2012 #14
Reminds me of the W.C. Fields quote TrogL Aug 2012 #10
Yes it is gambling... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #15
Excellent news. n/t JTFrog Aug 2012 #19
Pinball didn't used to have flippers. They were added purely to turn it from a game of chance to... Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #21
Ditto the elimination of the "free game" brooklynite Aug 2012 #34
All gambling requires some level of skill. Javaman Aug 2012 #22
Slot machines? GodlessBiker Aug 2012 #29
Modern slots no, but the old ones (non-electronic) yes. nt Javaman Aug 2012 #30
Pulling a lever on the side of the machine takes skill? GodlessBiker Aug 2012 #35
The old non-electronic machines weren't based on Algorithms as they are today. Javaman Aug 2012 #37
Some of gambling requires no skill. ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #36
I'm all in on this one Kingofalldems Aug 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rules that poker is...»Reply #8