Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Despite Assange claims, U.S. has no current case against him [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)28. You are saying that "a veto" by Obama "would have been a waste of time since it had
more than enough votes to be overridden"?
You do realize, don't you, that Obama was a Senator at the time that the vote was taken to give immunity for the telecoms that spied upon all of us for the Bush Administration?
And you must realize that Senators do not have veto power. The President does. Bush II was the President at the time, not Obama.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Don't worry. Be happy." I can almost hear that Bush Sr. campaign theme being played again.
leveymg
Aug 2012
#2
A lot of people should be in prison for invading Iraq based on a lie and killing tens of thousands
still_one
Aug 2012
#6
You either trust President Obama or you don't. Even if the administration believes there may be
24601
Aug 2012
#8
Obama voted for the FISA bill which immunized the telecom companies from prosecution for spying..
Fumesucker
Aug 2012
#9
You are saying that "a veto" by Obama "would have been a waste of time since it had
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#28
The US could, with a straight face, lie. StratFor e-mails state it is a SEALED indictment. nt
Poll_Blind
Aug 2012
#10
One of those arrested seems to have flipped for the FBI rather earlier
struggle4progress
Aug 2012
#35
Another excellent article showing why Assange needs to face his accusers in Sweden...
Agnosticsherbet
Aug 2012
#17
Even if that is true, she is still a woman and has a right to have her charge
Agnosticsherbet
Aug 2012
#41
because some anonymous nobodies on a discussion forum are so sure he is guilty
fascisthunter
Aug 2012
#44