Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(71,667 posts)
32. Is the CPI a cost-of-living index?
Fri May 4, 2018, 10:22 AM
May 2018
9. Is the CPI a cost-of-living index?

The CPI frequently is called a cost-of-living index, but it differs in important ways from a complete cost-of-living measure. We use a cost-of-living framework in making practical decisions about questions that arise in constructing the CPI. A cost-of-living index is a conceptual measurement goal, however, and not a straightforward alternative to the CPI. A cost-of-living index would measure changes over time in the amount that consumers need to spend to reach a certain utility level or standard of living. Both the CPI and a cost-of-living index would reflect changes in the prices of goods and services, such as food and clothing that are directly purchased in the marketplace; but a complete cost-of-living index would go beyond this role to also take into account changes in other governmental or environmental factors that affect consumers' well-being. It is very difficult to determine the proper treatment of public goods, such as safety and education, and other broad concerns, such as health, water quality, and crime, that would constitute a complete cost-of-living framework. Since the CPI does not attempt to quantify all the factors that affect the cost-of-living, it is sometimes termed a conditional cost-of-living index.

Traditionally, the CPI was considered an upper bound on a cost-of-living index in that the CPI did not reflect the changes in buying or consumption patterns that consumers would make to adjust to relative price changes. The ability to substitute means that the increase in the cost to consumers of maintaining their level of well-being tends to be somewhat less than the increase in the cost of the mix of goods and services they previously purchased.

Since January 1999, a geometric mean formula has been used to calculate most basic indexes within the CPI; in other words, the prices within most item categories (for example, apples) are averaged with the use of a geometric mean formula. This improvement moves the CPI closer to a cost-of-living measure, because the geometric mean formula allows for a modest amount of consumer substitution as relative prices within item categories change.

The Chained CPI (C-CPI-U) also allows for substitution across item categories, and is thought by some to be a closer approximation to a cost-of-living index. However, the expenditure data used to compute the final C-CPI-U isn't available until 10-12 months after the reference month, so a preliminary estimate of the index is published and later revised.

Additional information about the Chained CPI is available on the Chained Consumer Price Index webpage.

Chained Consumer Price Index For All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U)

The Bureau of Labor Statistics first began publishing the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in August 2002. Designated the C-CPI-U, the index supplements the existing indexes already produced by the BLS: the CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).

Questions and Answers page about the C-CPI-U.
Methodology
Introducing the Chained Consumer Price Index
Historical Chained Consumer Price Index (August 2017)

Related Articles

Comparison between Chained CPI-U and Regular CPI-U All-US Indexes in the Housing Sector (2000-2004) (PDF)
Comparison between Chained CPI-U and Regular CPI-U All-US Indexes at Lower Item-Aggregate Levels(2000-2003) (PDF)
Random Errors and Superlative Indexes (HTML)
For additional information on the C-CPI-U contact the CPI information office at cpi_info@bls.gov or 202-691-7000.

Last Modified Date: January 12, 2018

Thank you for being a part of this thread.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The calm before the storm of the Trump Slump. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #1
"The calm before the storm of the Trump Slump. . . ." LenaBaby61 May 2018 #13
Tourism down 4-7%, Chinese stopped buying $13,000,000,000 of soybeans (13 billion $). . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #15
Note that the BLS measures "nonfarm payroll employment." mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #16
Good Friday morning! BumRushDaShow May 2018 #2
Good morning. Yeah, I got up early this morning. For some reason, I can't stop doing these. mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #3
What trend is troubling to you? I don't notice anything in the OP 7962 May 2018 #6
This BumRushDaShow May 2018 #21
"posted earlier this week" mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #24
I see. Nearly 30k less than expected. And downward trending from Dec. 7962 May 2018 #36
Yes. BumRushDaShow May 2018 #37
Under 4%, lowest level for 18 years - Trump will repeat this a thousand times and go to 45% in polls Doodley May 2018 #4
The last time unemployment was this low, Fall of 2000, we lost the White House. DemocratSinceBirth May 2018 #19
That was before 9/11 CountAllVotes May 2018 #29
In our world, this report will most likely cause a market drop as pressures to increase pay beachbum bob May 2018 #5
Yes, and the Fed usually over reacts. Which we do NOT need. 7962 May 2018 #8
I have alternate view: the market is fearful & ready to drop. This may make a small bump up but wont Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #14
lots of ways to look at markets. The most influential is STABILITY beachbum bob May 2018 #34
Links to earlier reports mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #7
Additional links: mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #9
So if Obama would have left it at 9% on the way out the door like Bush.IDIOT did......... Bengus81 May 2018 #10
Okay, but where are the wages? That's what the Dems should be asking. Where are the wages? Yavin4 May 2018 #11
Per the report: mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #12
Wage growth is anemic. The Labor Force Participation Rate hasn't budged. DemocratSinceBirth May 2018 #17
Exactly. Sorry but at 3.9% UE we should be seeing higher wages Yavin4 May 2018 #27
A perspective from the trenches Kilgore May 2018 #18
Google Google News for "$25,000 signing bonus" mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #22
The mind-numbing rant, based on a version posted on the first Friday in September 2016: mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #20
I'm one of those "missing workers". I work, but it doesnt show up anywhere. 7962 May 2018 #38
But Chained CPI, oh nos... jmy May 2018 #23
For more information on the CPI, start here: mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2018 #28
Is the CPI a cost-of-living index? mahatmakanejeeves May 2018 #32
Corporations are all flush with cash now. forgotmylogin May 2018 #26
"businesses are finding they have to hire 2-3 people to make up for one veteran employee" BumRushDaShow May 2018 #31
Paradoxically, the market should meander upwards on a weak payroll report. yallerdawg May 2018 #30
I can go to ANY big box store,big chain food store where I live......... Bengus81 May 2018 #33
Reminds Me of the Dubya Tax Cut Bump TomCADem May 2018 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Payroll employment increa...»Reply #32