Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun May 6, 2018, 09:48 AM May 2018

Giuliani: Trump doesn't have to comply with subpoena from Mueller [View all]

Source: The Hill




BY BRETT SAMUELS - 05/06/18 09:30 AM EDT




Rudy Giuliani said Sunday that President Trump would not have to comply with a subpoena in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

“We don’t have to [comply with a subpoena]. He’s the president of the United States. We can assert same privilege as other presidents have," Giuliani said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Giuliani, who was recently hired to lead Trump’s legal team in the Russia probe, said he’d prefer the president receive the “Hillary Clinton treatment.” He said that would involve answering questions that were received in advance, while not under oath.

Whether Trump will testify before the special counsel has been a point of intrigue as Mueller’s probe nears its one-year mark.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/386411-giuliani-trump-doesnt-have-to-comply-with-subpoena-from-mueller



Giuliani: Cohen would have paid other women 'if it was necessary'

BY MALLORY SHELBOURNE - 05/06/18 09:00 AM EDT




Rudy Giuliani on Sunday said while he has no knowledge of President Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, paying any women in addition to Stormy Daniels, he believes Cohen would have done so if he deemed it “necessary.”

“I have no knowledge of that. But I would think if it was necessary, yes.” Giuliani, who recently joined Trump’s team of lawyers, told ABC’s “This Week” when asked about Cohen making payments to other women.

Giuliani’s latest remarks come after the former New York City mayor told Fox News last week that Trump reimbursed Cohen for the payment. The president had previously said he had no knowledge of it.

“I don’t think anyone believes that he knew about it at the time,” Giuliani, who's now a member of Trump's legal team, said Sunday of the $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford.

more
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/386407-giuliani-cohen-would-have-paid-other-women-if-it-was-necessary
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rudy doing his best MontanaMama May 2018 #1
lol....rudy making shit up....no one can ignore a subpoena out of hand without being beachbum bob May 2018 #2
Read his statement carefully: "We can assert same privilege as other presidents have". n/t PoliticAverse May 2018 #4
his impication is clear, any way, a court will rule and 99% based on precedence beachbum bob May 2018 #7
"Pleading the 5th will land his ass in jail for contempt" - no, unless he gets immunity he has... PoliticAverse May 2018 #14
Sure, can plead right against self incrimination, but the right to not respond to a lawful Fred Sanders May 2018 #22
He didn't say "not respond" he said "not comply". He indicated they would respond... PoliticAverse May 2018 #24
No quibbles on that. The shit hits the fan when criminal indictments are laid and Shitler refuses to Fred Sanders May 2018 #25
Trump will be asked about what he knew what others were doing... beachbum bob May 2018 #23
Yes but as I noted the 5th applies - "in any situation" the answer "would furnish a link... PoliticAverse May 2018 #26
Taking a 5th, can be considered an impeachable position, a very beachbum bob May 2018 #35
This is the tricky part...if trump takes the 5th on questions of what beachbum bob May 2018 #36
Would DT be rational enough to consult with his attorney... LiberalFighter May 2018 #37
He really meant what dictators are privileged to do. olegramps May 2018 #11
Yes completely and Giuliani is just another enabler FakeNoose May 2018 #19
yep as Avenatti said, they're making stuff up as they go onetexan May 2018 #18
He's the president of the United States. We can assert same privilege as other presidents have." Botany May 2018 #3
Let's find out and see... C_U_L8R May 2018 #5
In other words, there's a subpoena on the way. PubliusEnigma May 2018 #6
I suspect very soon. beachbum bob May 2018 #8
I think Timmygoat May 2018 #9
Didn't work for Bill Clinton Vinnie From Indy May 2018 #10
He can assert it but it does not mean that treestar May 2018 #12
+1. Nixon was not above the law. Nor is Trump. emulatorloo May 2018 #33
So if Trump and attorneys are 100% certain they can just ignore Mueller... Freethinker65 May 2018 #13
Dude has a very short, or very convenient, memory. n/t malthaussen May 2018 #15
Lock The Up! jpak May 2018 #16
Sorry. See United States v. Nixon PSPS May 2018 #17
SCOTUS will rule anywhere from 6-3 to 9-0 against him based on precedent. DemocratSinceBirth May 2018 #20
The Clown has spoken....................everyone in the criminal enterprise is above the law.... turbinetree May 2018 #21
Tell this guy Botany May 2018 #27
U.S. Supreme Court: Read United States v. Nixon, dumbass. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #28
That was a very different court in a very different time Algernon Moncrieff May 2018 #32
Bob Bauer WH counsel for our President Obama..how he sizes up the Nixon Long Shadow asiliveandbreathe May 2018 #29
WaPo--Giuliani: It is possible Michael Cohen paid off other women for Trump Julian Englis May 2018 #30
Translation: We're betting that this SCOTUS will let us claim Executive Privilege Algernon Moncrieff May 2018 #31
So presidents are above the Law rock May 2018 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Giuliani: Trump doesn't h...