Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge strikes down Nevada’s 'none' voting option [View all]NYC Liberal
(20,444 posts)29. You realize it's the state legislatures that ratify amendments?
Tell me: which state is going to consent to having its equal suffrage in the Senate denied? It would never happen and if it did I'd stay far away from a state that with enough idiots to elect enough legislators to do it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm even worse off, I'm a liberal. I voted for Bill Owens for representative, and will again.
A Simple Game
Aug 2012
#24
This subthread concerns whether a "None" option is ever sensible, not whether it's unconstitutional
Jim Lane
Aug 2012
#16
I wrote in "none" for every local race in 2008 and only cast votes at the top of the ticket.
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2012
#19
I should have been clearer, yes I do mean a system where another election is
A Simple Game
Aug 2012
#42
Yes. And like I said, any state that had enough people who were dumb enough to
NYC Liberal
Aug 2012
#35