Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge strikes down Nevada’s 'none' voting option [View all]A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)It seems everyone has a different definition of democracy. Yes, yes I know what a republic is, we don't need to go there for this discussion.
What it seems to boil down to is my view of democracy is that the voter has the ultimate power. I know it is much more complicated than this, but very simply, what the majority say and want as long as it doesn't harm anyone or limit anyone's freedoms, should be the final word. You can not take away a voter representation, unless you take away their right to vote. The voters represents themselves.
Would taking away a person's Representative hurt the people in the minority that wanted someone? Would it be any worse than being stuck with the person you didn't vote for? For me the choice between a teabagger or no one, I'll take no one.
There are times that I would have voted for "none of the above" but so far just on the local level. But I live in a fairly liberal area even if it is only slightly purple. Our Republicans for the most part are pretty moderate.