Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge strikes down Nevada’s 'none' voting option [View all]NYC Liberal
(20,444 posts)It's one thing when your candidate loses and their opponent is elected. You still get representation. You still get someone to whom you can go with your issues/concerns/whatever. Even if I'm a left-winger/commie/socialist and my rep is a right-wing teabagger. You haven't addressed the issues of:
1. Just because a majority think something, doesn't mean they get to use that to tyrannize the minority.
2. What offices do we apply this to? How does it work if we have no president, which means no executive branch since the president appoints all the members of the executive branch who have any real authority?
Why would you prefer having no one elected, over having a system where "none of the above" winning forces a new election in which the original candidates are not allowed to run?