Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

pangaia

(24,324 posts)

27. The earlier OP explains this.

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Tue May 22, 2018, 06:40 PM

May 2018

No need to keep speculating.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Law firm of Stormy Daniel's attorney hit with $10 million judgment [View all] pnwmom May 2018 OP

Che k it out snowybirdie May 2018 #1

The LA Times isn't generally a fake news source. n/t pnwmom May 2018 #4

I heard Avenatti said it was a different Firm... FarPoint May 2018 #26

Read this post which explains what happened... PoliticAverse May 2018 #40

"Plan B", heh. Ellipsis May 2018 #2

It appears to be a different Avenatti neohippie May 2018 #3

Maybe it was an old law firm that Avenatti was associated with, and that's why pnwmom May 2018 #5

Just to be factual here jberryhill May 2018 #9

Is his current firm on the hook or he personally on the hook? pnwmom May 2018 #11

I posted a link to the settlement agreement jberryhill May 2018 #14

I mean, technically couldn't he have incorporated the law firm that, along with him personally, pnwmom May 2018 #23

The first question doesn't make any sense jberryhill May 2018 #24

Uh.....no. Jazzgirl May 2018 #34

No. It's the same one. Apparently he's claiming that his representation of Daniels onenote May 2018 #6

He's giving a "lawyer's answer" RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #16

As Rachel Maddow once said, "Michael Avenatti was unavoidable for comment" jberryhill May 2018 #36

I feel like he's our side's Carter Page RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #37

Still involves him, its just not connected to the Daniels case. He's deflecting. 7962 May 2018 #38

More background from Business Insider SeattleVet May 2018 #7

The firm isn't disputing the $10 million figure. onenote May 2018 #8

The total judgement was for $4.85 million, with $2 million due two days pnwmom May 2018 #10

So do you think this part of the LA Times story is made up? onenote May 2018 #12

No. n/t pnwmom May 2018 #22

It wasn't a "penalty" -- it was a settlement onenote May 2018 #15

I'm thinking bucolic_frolic May 2018 #13

It. Doesn't. Matter. jberryhill May 2018 #17

The LA Times article bucolic_frolic May 2018 #19

In what way? jberryhill May 2018 #20

Eagan Avenatti was the firm involved in the case being described; it declared bankruptcy onenote May 2018 #18

He and his new firm are explicit guarantors of the settlement jberryhill May 2018 #21

The only guarantor I see in the settlement and in the guranty is Avenatti personally onenote May 2018 #25

Ah, well there you go jberryhill May 2018 #28

:) onenote May 2018 #29

You go first on this one, though... jberryhill May 2018 #30

I'm not even going to pretend to know enough to assess that letter onenote May 2018 #31

Enjoy the game jberryhill May 2018 #35

Someone finally untangled much of it: jberryhill May 2018 #45

The earlier OP explains this. pangaia May 2018 #27

#facknews ! stonecutter357 May 2018 #32

Bull. Jazzgirl May 2018 #33

Whats bull? 7962 May 2018 #39

How so? Codeine May 2018 #44

This guy is a creep andytheteacher May 2018 #41

Interesting talking points you have there Tarc May 2018 #43

Allegations are more credable Maxheader May 2018 #42