Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
30. After developing devastating health consequences.....
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 09:00 PM
Aug 2012

...I too quit smoking on January 31, 2009, - that was the day I went into the hospital for surgery to correct 40 years of smoking's damage. And while there to get that fixed, they found more goodies -- also linked to smoking.

Yet I would rather endure a lifetime of ugly tobacco disease pictures than to risk even one person going through what I have. Not to mention what others have gone through that is much worse. I wish now these kinds of pics had been around when I was a kid watching John Cameron Swazey's Old Golds wafting smoke on his news desk or Johnny Carson taking a puff as they came back from commercials. They made it all seem so right and normal.

Tobacco has few positives and while we can explain much of this continued smoking behavior on the past lack of understanding -- particularly since we were lied to so thoroughly and by doctors no less -- we now know that disease and heartache is the potential future for smokers who ignore these warnings. Not to mention the widows and children left behind in smoking's wake.

Are these pics over-the-top? Yes. That's what it'll take to try to undo the normalization of swallowing smoke into our lungs. And if we believe that the government has a responsibility to provide healthcare for all Americans in order to protect their health, then I think these picture warnings are part and parcel with that goal.

IMHO

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The world moves forward, we move backward. nt onehandle Aug 2012 #1
Mitt Philosophy: Corporations are people.. cyclezealot Aug 2012 #3
There Are Already Health Warnings n/t Suziq Aug 2012 #7
No - We Harass Smokers Suziq Aug 2012 #4
Don't talk about "ridiculous prices" Spider Jerusalem Aug 2012 #9
it's not about you! Carolina Aug 2012 #35
Alcohol isn't dangerous when used correctly. NutmegYankee Aug 2012 #39
Exactly. DeSwiss Aug 2012 #14
This photo is why I have a problem with it Mojorabbit Aug 2012 #21
After developing devastating health consequences..... DeSwiss Aug 2012 #30
Is there a single person in the US who is not already aware that smoking is bad for them? 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #22
Children. They are the official unofficial targets of Big Tobacco. onehandle Aug 2012 #25
And kids are thoroughly motivated by longterm consequences 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #38
Meanwhile, the federal gov't is giving almost $200 million of OUR MONEY annually to tobacco farmers slackmaster Aug 2012 #2
Tobacco products here in the UK feature large and graphic warnings. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2012 #5
Canada has them, Australia's working on it TrogL Aug 2012 #11
You'd think that one on the bottom left would be enough for most guys to quit alarimer Aug 2012 #28
They know it is BS former9thward Aug 2012 #33
Vasoconstrictors lead to ED it isn't rocket science. Exultant Democracy Aug 2012 #40
If it was as simple as that scores of millions of smokers would not be having sex. former9thward Aug 2012 #41
That is like saying smoking doesn't age your skin, because it's age related Exultant Democracy Aug 2012 #42
You have an agenda so evidence doesn't matter to you. former9thward Aug 2012 #44
A bought-and-paid-for court system. nt valerief Aug 2012 #6
yep. Not very pretty, is it ailsagirl Aug 2012 #26
The people attempting to have these graphics have far more money than Big Tobacco. former9thward Aug 2012 #34
More graphics/ads are needed IMO CountAllVotes Aug 2012 #8
I quit, and it's not that hard... xtraxritical Aug 2012 #19
Reuters did not link to the USCA-DC opinion as a reference... xocet Aug 2012 #10
I'm happy about this. Are we going to put graphic warnings on cars, booze, prescriptions, etc.? ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #12
Can't compare any of those. alp227 Aug 2012 #17
Actually, cars do cause accidents when used as directed. ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #18
Fatalities from unavoidable car accidents are very rare muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #32
cigarettes have no redeeming value Carolina Aug 2012 #36
Nothing really has redeeming value because all value is subjective. ZombieHorde Aug 2012 #37
I suspect that they are a cash cow for government primavera Aug 2012 #43
This judge brought to you by our friendly Resident W! benld74 Aug 2012 #13
There we go again..."corporate" free speech rights..... Swede Atlanta Aug 2012 #15
"corporate speech rights" are an unconstitutional legal farce foisted upon us by a corrupt court. Vincardog Aug 2012 #20
Were there not already enough warnings that cigarettes may cause health problems? 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #23
Don't like this trend..."corporate speech rights." dixiegrrrrl Aug 2012 #16
good WooWooWoo Aug 2012 #24
It's a dumb idea. MrSlayer Aug 2012 #27
Corporate "free speech"? Ruby the Liberal Aug 2012 #29
When do we get graphic images on HFCS...or white flour...or alcohol... MercutioATC Aug 2012 #31
I know an anti-smoking picture that would WORK to dissuade kids from smoking jmowreader Aug 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. court strikes down g...»Reply #30