Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
36. Political context is important to understanding these events
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:23 PM
Jan 2012

It is clear that many here do not understand the full political context of the action.

The SM2 was purchased by the Japanese government from the Institute of Cetacean Research (whalers). Their argument is that technically the vessel can operate in Australian waters, despite the ruling of the Australian federal court, because they are not specifically a whaling vessel any more. (The federal court basically upheld a ban on whaling vessels in the Australian economic zone and territorial waters.)

This position is quite controversial within the Australian government and before this action had provoked a lot of protest from opposition parties. The current government had made a fairly big deal during the elections of promising support for protection of the Antarctic Whale Sanctuary, and many voters feel betrayed by the government's recent choices on this issue.

In particular, the SM2 was allowed to operate in territorial waters without even so much as turning on its AIS. (AIS is a system that identifies ships, their locations, courses and speeds ... obviously useful information when charting a course through heavily trafficked waters. This should NOT be interpreted to suggest that the SM2 was a hazard to navigation! It is more of an add insult to injury kind of thing ... )

If you think the target of this operation was the crew of the SM2, I think you are mistaken. Enforcement of the Antarctic Treaty, and of Australia's sovereignty, is likely to become a very hot topic in Australian political life in the very near term and could even conceivably result in a change of government. This is difficult to gauge because while there is broad support for the anti-whaling position, it is by no means universal, nor does it automatically trump other considerations in Australian political life.

The activists are not victims and are not playing victims. They have aimed a stake directly at the heart of a government that has proven to be unwilling to enforce its stated anti-whaling policies and its sovereignty. If you will, they have tried (and in large part succeeded) in forcing the issue. It remains to be seen if this will prove to be an effective action in that sense, but it is clear it has already stimulated new energy in the discussion.

Trav

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Are we supposed to be shocked or concerned about this? Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #1
They're protest-business. boppers Jan 2012 #2
You are slandering the Sierra Club Kolesar Jan 2012 #3
Ohh, nice website, wonder what it cost? boppers Jan 2012 #4
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #5
By which you mean "collecting a six figure salary"? boppers Jan 2012 #6
+ 1 nt hack89 Jan 2012 #11
Heavens. Six whole figures? Nearly 2% spent on admin costs? The horror. DirkGently Jan 2012 #14
Well, the other 1% CEOs making millions to run fortune 500 companies agree with you! boppers Jan 2012 #37
Find one that makes six figures instead 7-9 & try again. DirkGently Jan 2012 #40
Wow. They're not allowed to have a website? How about cell phones. Can they have cellphones? DirkGently Jan 2012 #25
"people who are in business" boppers Jan 2012 #38
Yes Non-profits. In the business of doing good, not screwing everyone else. You do DirkGently Jan 2012 #41
Yes, non-profits(!?) who make millions. By "caring". boppers Jan 2012 #45
We perceive a thing in such a way as to better validate our own presumptions. LanternWaste Jan 2012 #52
Sierra does exactly what it claims to do. Sorry, no way to spin that. DirkGently Jan 2012 #62
direct actions are not done for money,. Civilization2 Jan 2012 #9
And god-forbid an activist make as much as a school superintendent DirkGently Jan 2012 #20
They have saved many whales' lives. roody Jan 2012 #13
Agreed. This is the sort of thing that annoys me. TheWraith Jan 2012 #7
Yes don't do anything that is against the law, ever! Civilization2 Jan 2012 #10
Well if our side gets to break the law because we think we're doing something that's right... ProgressoDem Jan 2012 #17
We don't like when Rwingers stomp people's heads on curbs. DirkGently Jan 2012 #22
Well you've got to accept the results of your actions. ProgressoDem Jan 2012 #23
Obviously they are accepting the consequences of their actions. They knew exactly what would happen. DirkGently Jan 2012 #24
I do see what you're saying. ProgressoDem Jan 2012 #27
Yes, Watson plays things up for maximum effect. That's one of DirkGently Jan 2012 #42
In my eyes its not so much playing things up to maximum effect as its lying and twisting the truth Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #46
An example of an actual lie would be more convincing. DirkGently Jan 2012 #60
so in your opinion Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #65
Which fact is not true? You're disagreeing with his spin. The Japanese claim they're terrorists. DirkGently Jan 2012 #68
i think i pointed it out quite well Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #69
Rosa Parks broke the law... LanternWaste Jan 2012 #53
See reply 27. ProgressoDem Jan 2012 #55
Except their side (usually) gets to make the rules. Doremus Jan 2012 #67
What if 'activists' from a right-wing, say Ron Paul organization decided to occupy a building Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #18
Occupying isn't protesting, it's trespassing. ProgressoDem Jan 2012 #28
Japan's Illegal Slaughter of Whales Annoys Me raindaddy Jan 2012 #15
Oh, but Japan's crimes are committed by a state. So they don't count. DirkGently Jan 2012 #19
Yep, we're such good peeps, playing by the rules and all.. raindaddy Jan 2012 #26
How about, don't break international law and illegally slaughter 1000 whales Downtown Hound Jan 2012 #35
you mean except for the fact that its consider legal research by most Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #44
Really? Just who are "most?" Downtown Hound Jan 2012 #47
most countries involved with the IWC since Japan is abiding by article VIII Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #51
Oh you mean governments? Downtown Hound Jan 2012 #54
As i said Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #58
Please Downtown Hound Jan 2012 #64
you know what the IWC is yes? Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #66
yeah well they did this in australian waters PatrynXX Jan 2012 #48
So its ok for the sea shepards to tail the japanese but the japanese shouldn't be following sea Bodhi BloodWave Jan 2012 #50
or you can go to their audited financial statements melm00se Jan 2012 #8
Yep. Sierra's an outstanding organization. Only RW propaganda says otherwise. DirkGently Jan 2012 #16
I see another South Park episode coming up. nt hack89 Jan 2012 #12
They slipped while on board? rocktivity Jan 2012 #21
They're really not very good at "playing the victim" hughee99 Jan 2012 #29
Seems to me the Japanese whalers are "playing the victim". baldguy Jan 2012 #30
The press release is from the Sea Shepherd hughee99 Jan 2012 #31
You think the Japanese offered to return them to their ship? DirkGently Jan 2012 #61
If you sneak abord someone else's ship hughee99 Jan 2012 #63
Um the whalers are bankrupt. PatrynXX Jan 2012 #49
They bankrupted the Japanese government! Holy shit. hughee99 Jan 2012 #56
They're stowaways. They now have to answer to the skipper of the ship. MADem Jan 2012 #32
They understand the consequences. raindaddy Jan 2012 #33
Playing the "prisoner" card when they've trespassed probably isn't helpful. MADem Jan 2012 #34
They should be grateful the Japanese death penalty is only applied in cases of murder and treason. DRoseDARs Jan 2012 #43
I (mistakenly) thought Japan got rid of the death penalty! Even for murder...? MADem Jan 2012 #57
Political context is important to understanding these events The Traveler Jan 2012 #36
Bad move BoulderBean Jan 2012 #39
My wife and I have consistently provided Sea Shepherd with financial support but onenote Jan 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Three activists 'prisoner...»Reply #36