Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Assange could go to international court [View all]struggle4progress
(126,297 posts)35. The Spaniard Garzon is not Ecuador's representative but heads Assange's legal team:
... Judge Baltasar Garzón, who is leading Julian Assanges legal team, announced Thursday that he will go before the International Court of Justice at The Hague if Britain refuses to allow the WikiLeaks founder to travel to Ecuador, the country that granted him asylum.
In an interview after Ecuador had announced that it was approving Assanges request for diplomatic asylum, the former High Court judge criticized the show of force and threats of invading the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where his client has been holed up since June 19.
Of course they cant do that, he said. They have to comply with diplomatic and legal obligations under the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and respect the sovereignty of a country that has granted asylum.
If Britain doesnt comply with its obligations, we will go before International Court of Justice to demand that Britain complies with its obligations because there is a person who runs the risk of being persecuted politically, Garzón said ...
Garzón: We will go to international court if UK blocks Assange exit
Spanish judge says Britain must respect Ecuadors decision to grant asylum
Foreign Minister Hague says his governments only obligation is to extradite WikiLeaks founder
http://elpais.com/elpais/2012/08/16/inenglish/1345140794_436860.html
The poor old chap has come entirely unhinged
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In practice countries pick and choose when they'll recognize international courts.
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#8
Assange's legal team might want a quick peek at the Court's website before filing:
struggle4progress
Aug 2012
#6
The Spaniard Garzon is not Ecuador's representative but heads Assange's legal team:
struggle4progress
Aug 2012
#35
Assange will take UK to ‘World Court’ if not given safe passage to Ecuado
struggle4progress
Aug 2012
#38
Assange would argue that the "ordinary crime" alleged against him and the charge
JDPriestly
Aug 2012
#14
The Congressional Research Service examined Espionage Act grounds for seeking indictment.
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2012
#31
"seeking to close gaps in the laws" = ex post facto and thus unconstitutional
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2012
#37
Only if Assange promises to go into custody if the Swedish prosecutors decide to arrest him
hack89
Aug 2012
#17
If Ecuador and Assange refuse to recognize Sweden's right to arrest Assange if necessary
hack89
Aug 2012
#28
The ICJ decided in 1950 that diplomatic asylum only applied if both countries had already agreed
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#21