Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Kentucky board of education OKs Bible literacy standards [View all]elleng
(141,926 posts)14. I actually approve of this, and did so in my daughters' schools
(which were 'parochial,' as the curriculum made it clear this was done for reasons of understanding literature and history.
Of course, I have little/no confidence that Kentucky will do so, and of course KY will neglect 'OTHER' world religions' 'words.'
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They are referencing this as "elective" in paragraph two. But we know what will eventually happen.
dameatball
Jun 2018
#7
Since there isn't anything like universal agreement on Biblical meaning or translation
okaawhatever
Jun 2018
#38
Jewish and Muslim and Buddhist and athiest students will kindly fuck the hell off.
Paladin
Jun 2018
#10
My objection is less to the-Bible as literature-class, than it is to-there's
okaawhatever
Jun 2018
#41
Are they going to use the King James "version"so they can teach the little tykes................
turbinetree
Jun 2018
#30
Standards that require the elective "as a literature" class does not stray into proselytizing...
Freethinker65
Jun 2018
#31