Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
41. I wonder if any law enforcement operations are impacted by this.
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:56 PM
Aug 2012

Anonymous did nothing productive with this unless we think harassing/bullying law enforcement entities accomplishes something.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

sounds good a geek named Bob Aug 2012 #1
There is nothing as important tama Aug 2012 #9
My wife and I a geek named Bob Aug 2012 #10
Delicious! tama Aug 2012 #13
I passed on your suggestion to my wife a geek named Bob Aug 2012 #15
Rowan (sorbus aucuparia), tama Aug 2012 #17
Tama, thank you for the kind wishes! a geek named Bob Aug 2012 #20
That was such a bad move by the Brits for so many reasons... hlthe2b Aug 2012 #2
They never made a threat. They simply reminded the Ecuadorans that they have a law on their books. MADem Aug 2012 #32
Nice summary! randome Aug 2012 #34
Maybe the OAS resolution meant something after all n/t AntiFascist Aug 2012 #3
Good. Now all they gotta do is wait him out. nt msanthrope Aug 2012 #4
And this pleases you for some reason? Canuckistanian Aug 2012 #6
He will not be there for years. He will be there only as long msanthrope Aug 2012 #7
You mean Britain decided it was not the right time nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #5
When the UK reiterated for the hundredth time that it had never threatened to invade the embassy, struggle4progress Aug 2012 #11
And the OAS had a declaration for fun? nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #12
note that they changed the declaration since the brits said they had made no threats Bodhi BloodWave Aug 2012 #14
Two different nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #16
OAS resolution calls for bilateral talks in Assange standoff struggle4progress Aug 2012 #18
And why do you think it does? nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #19
The ultimate object of the diplomatic immunities is to facilitate diplomacy itself, struggle4progress Aug 2012 #21
Oh for god sakes we have done this in the past nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #22
Every case is to be judged on its own merits. The usual international standard for struggle4progress Aug 2012 #23
He didn't claim to be facing danger in Britain. He got asylum based on the danger he faces sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #25
Thank you, sabrina 1! Great post! nt Peace Patriot Aug 2012 #37
Ecuador did not get huge support from OAS hack89 Aug 2012 #38
I thought this was obvious. Why didn't they come for Assange? Do you know what this was sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #39
I see no support for Assange or Wikileaks in the OAS statement hack89 Aug 2012 #40
I guess you have not read the Latin American cables released by Wikileaks. sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #42
So why is the OAS refusing to comment on Assange? hack89 Aug 2012 #43
The OAS includes Canada and the US... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #44
So where is the huge international outcry in support of Assange and Ecuador? hack89 Aug 2012 #45
The OAS happens to represent the entire Western Hemisphere... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #46
And yet the OAS has not voiced support for Assange hack89 Aug 2012 #47
uhhhhh, that's not the issue... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #48
He is not in any position to dictate terms. hack89 Aug 2012 #49
Ecuador IS in a position to diplomatically discuss terms with both Britain and Sweden... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #50
I think the embassy is the perfect place for him at the moment. hack89 Aug 2012 #51
Obama would probably agree... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #52
Shhh...it's about the US...shhh don't tell anybody nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #28
It's a conspiracy! The University of Copenhagen's Biotech Research and Innovation Centre struggle4progress Aug 2012 #29
Of course, you now turn all "serious" on us nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #30
Diplomatic asylum as opposed to political asylum is not recognized in international law. hack89 Aug 2012 #33
Lol! sabrina 1 Aug 2012 #24
I wonder if Anonymous taking down a few UK governement websites for a few days Fire Walk With Me Aug 2012 #8
I very strongly doubt the government would care that much. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #26
Good, because more sites are now down :) Fire Walk With Me Aug 2012 #35
Ecuador Embassy: Don't relax your guard. In the Falklands SDjack Aug 2012 #27
Ecuador lsewpershad Aug 2012 #31
Bullies always back down when confronted. DeSwiss Aug 2012 #36
I wonder if any law enforcement operations are impacted by this. randome Aug 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ecuador says Britain with...»Reply #41