Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Mueller indicts 12 Russian intelligence officers for allegedly conspiring to hack 2016 U.S. presiden [View all]still_one
(98,883 posts)there is no evidence of Russian interference, and HIS justification for it was because we were lied about WMDs in Iraq, along with other falsehoods, this is not credible. It is a bullshit argument, and completely ignored the fact the Flynn already had specific accusations against him, along with the fact that the people making those accusations did not have anything in common those saying there were saying there were WMDs in Iraq.
I cannot find the exact piece I am talking about, but this touches on the flavor of what his thoughts were
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/something-about-this-russia-story-stinks-110164/
This Washington Monthly probably expresses Taibbi's views best at the time:
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2017/04/04/matt-taibbis-skepticism-of-the-russian-hacking-coverage-is-all-wrong/
He has slowly evolved his position since then, which is more than I can say about Greenwald, though as things evolve and it becames more than evident, I suspect Mr. Greenwald will come out saying something to the effect that "I always knew there was Russian interference", in a similar way Greewald denied that he ever supported bush's invasion of Iraq.