Colorado baker sues state officials, claiming continued religious persecution

[SunSeeker]

48. Oh but it is, FBaggins. It was all about WHO was buying the cake, not what was said.

Prohibiting vulgarity does not involved discrimination, since the same rule applies no matter who is buying the cake. All the gay couple wanted was a wedding cake with their names on it, like any other marrying couple.

But when it came to his wedding cakes, he refused to make them for gay couples. That is discrimination. Whether or not he might still sell a gay couple other products like cookies is irrelevant. He still discriminated against them in that instance.

This is why a landlord would be popped for housing discrimination if he refused to rent to black families at his properties in a white neighborhood, even if he would rent to them at another property he owns in a black neighborhood. Ask Trump.