Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Trump Didn't Consult McGahn About Hush-Money Payments, Source Says [View all]
Source: Bloomberg News
By Shannon Pettypiece
August 22, 2018, 1:50 PM EDT Updated on August 22, 2018, 2:18 PM EDT
Failure to consult campaign finance lawyer may be key evidence
McGahn expects to be questioned by federal prosecutors
President Donald Trump didnt consult his campaign finance lawyer Don McGahn about hush-money payments that were made days before the election and are now the center of a criminal case, a person familiar with the matter said.
The absence of McGahn, who is now White House counsel, could be a key piece of evidence in any criminal prosecution, according to the person close to McGahn. Prosecutors could argue it shows Trump knew the payments were illegal and hid them. But Trumps lawyers could counter that its a sign Trump didnt realize they were related to the campaign.
McGahn, the person said, expects to be questioned by federal prosecutors in New York about his knowledge of the payments, which were the basis for campaign finance charges against Trumps longtime personal lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen.
Trump said in an interview with Fox News the payments were not even a campaign violation because they werent taken out of campaign finance. He said he only learned of the payments later on.
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-22/mcgahn-is-said-not-to-have-known-of-trump-s-hush-money-payments
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's FAUX New's line, why repeat that strawman here? Cohen copped to a felony not a civil fine
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#5
So not reporting the campaign benefiting payment and trying to hide its source is perfectly legal?
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#7
So there was no duty to report the in-kind contribution because it was mixed-use? Hell, EVERYONE ...
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#23
At them minimum this goes to trial for the avg candidate and a reasonable juror would decided on
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#25
The guy on Ari's show is directly addressing this issue. Not reporting a campaign benefiting ...
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#8
The money was to benefit the campaign and not reported regardless of its source
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#4
Is it really illegal to receive a cash and in-kind donation to the campaign and not report it?
Mc Mike
Aug 2018
#9
+1, not only that it sounds like they KNOWINGLY hid the in-kind contribution via shell companies
uponit7771
Aug 2018
#11
Ignorance of the applicability of laws of which you are ignorant. 'Unknown unknowns'. Nt
Mc Mike
Aug 2018
#19
They can try but seeing as Cohen is a lawyer the prosecutor should be able to destroy them if they
cstanleytech
Aug 2018
#10