Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

0rganism

(25,540 posts)
17. depending on context
Fri Aug 31, 2018, 05:38 PM
Aug 2018

the capital gains tax rates are a sick joke that serve as direct evidence of how regressive our tax system has become, but that's non sequitur.

a 2% flat tax is a regressive tax. you can call it "small" or "token" if you like, that's up to your opinion. the simple fact remains that it is regressive. sure it won't sting like a 10% flat tax, but why regress at all if we don't have to?

i don't understand your reasoning around this. you agreed that income taxes should be progressive rather than regressive, yet you also expressed multiple times that a flat tax on income is a desirable method of revenue acquisition. which is it?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arizona Supreme Court Rem...»Reply #17